Re: [PATCH] Correct minor spelling mistake in huge_memory.c.

["David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 12/18/25 12:20, klourencodev@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Kevin Lourenco <klourencodev@gmail.com>
> 
> No functional changes.

Subject: "mm/huge_memory: correct minor spelling mistake"

Then a simple "Let's correct progated -> propagated in a comment."

You can drop the "no functional change" part as you only modify a comment.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Lourenco <klourencodev@gmail.com>
> ---
>   mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 40cf59301c21..5efd2cf4f073 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3220,7 +3220,7 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>   				swp_entry = make_readable_device_private_entry(
>   							page_to_pfn(page + i));
>   			/*
> -			 * Young and dirty bits are not progated via swp_entry
> +			 * Young and dirty bits are not propagated via swp_entry
>   			 */
>   			entry = swp_entry_to_pte(swp_entry);
>   			if (soft_dirty)

Are there any other spelling issues in that file so we can avoid more of 
these patches that don't add a lot of value and only consume reviewer time?

-- 
Cheers

David