From: Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com <Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH] misc: i2c_eeprom: implement different probe test eeprom offset
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 08:55:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05e52cfa-77b0-d463-00a8-39a42704eaf3@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ftcd6mdk.fsf@tarshish>
On 06.05.2020 19:47, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Eugen,
>
> On Wed, May 06 2020, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>> Because of this commit :
>> 5ae84860b0 ("misc: i2c_eeprom: verify that the chip is functional at probe()")
>> at probe time, each eeprom is tested for read at offset 0.
>>
>> The Atmel AT24MAC402 eeprom has different mapping. One i2c slave address is
>> used for the lower 0x80 bytes and another i2c slave address is used for the
>> upper 0x80 bytes. Because of this basically the i2c master sees 2 different
>> slaves. We need the upper bytes because we read the unique MAC address from
>> this EEPROM area.
>>
>> However this implies that our slave address will return error on reads
>> from address 0x0 to 0x80.
>>
>> To solve this, implemented a way to figure out from the compatible udevice_id
>> 'data' field which offset we should attempt to read.
>> Added the offset as one byte in the data field (byte number 3).
>> Created two macros that will convert offset to 'data' field and back.
>>
>> The probe function will now read this offset and use it, instead of blindly
>> checking offset 0.
>>
>> This will fix the regression noticed on these EEPROMs since the commit
>> abovementioned that introduces the probe failed issue.
>
> Judging from the Linux at24 driver that commit appears to break a number
> of other eeprom chips. I suggest to just revert it.
>
> baruch
>
Hi,
Please disregard this patch as it's done for u-boot 2020.01 . I did not
notice driver changed in later versions. I sent a v2 that is done for
the master u-boot.
Thanks !
>>
>> The offset field can for sure be updated later at a 2byte offset if needed
>> by anyone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c b/drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c
>> index 3755dbf74b..79805cc46e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/i2c_eeprom.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@
>> #include <i2c.h>
>> #include <i2c_eeprom.h>
>>
>> +/* These macros are used to encode/decode the starting EEPROM offset into the
>> + * udevice_id structure's data field 3rd byte.
>> + * Lower 2 bytes of the data field are used for pagewidth.
>> + */
>> +#define I2C_EEPROM_OFFSET_TO_DATA(v) ((v) << 16)
>> +#define I2C_EEPROM_DATA_TO_OFFSET(v) ((v) >> 16)
>> +
>> int i2c_eeprom_read(struct udevice *dev, int offset, uint8_t *buf, int size)
>> {
>> const struct i2c_eeprom_ops *ops = device_get_ops(dev);
>> @@ -85,11 +92,17 @@ static int i2c_eeprom_std_ofdata_to_platdata(struct udevice *dev)
>>
>> static int i2c_eeprom_std_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>> {
>> + u64 data = dev_get_driver_data(dev);
>> u8 test_byte;
>> int ret;
>>
>> /* Verify that the chip is functional */
>> - ret = i2c_eeprom_read(dev, 0, &test_byte, 1);
>> + /*
>> + * Not all eeproms start from offset 0. Valid offset is encoded in
>> + * upper bits of the data (byte 3).
>> + */
>> + ret = i2c_eeprom_read(dev, I2C_EEPROM_DATA_TO_OFFSET(data) & 0xFF,
>> + &test_byte, 1);
>> if (ret)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> @@ -105,7 +118,8 @@ static const struct udevice_id i2c_eeprom_std_ids[] = {
>> { .compatible = "atmel,24c08", .data = 4 },
>> { .compatible = "atmel,24c08a", .data = 4 },
>> { .compatible = "atmel,24c16a", .data = 4 },
>> - { .compatible = "atmel,24mac402", .data = 4 },
>> + { .compatible = "atmel,24mac402",
>> + .data = (4 | I2C_EEPROM_OFFSET_TO_DATA(0x80))},
>> { .compatible = "atmel,24c32", .data = 5 },
>> { .compatible = "atmel,24c64", .data = 5 },
>> { .compatible = "atmel,24c128", .data = 6 },
>
>
> --
> ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
> =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
> - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 16:08 [PATCH] misc: i2c_eeprom: implement different probe test eeprom offset Eugen Hristev
2020-05-06 16:47 ` Baruch Siach
2020-05-07 8:55 ` Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com [this message]
2020-05-07 10:00 ` Heiko Schocher
2020-05-07 10:11 ` Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05e52cfa-77b0-d463-00a8-39a42704eaf3@microchip.com \
--to=eugen.hristev@microchip.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.