From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: luoliang@kylinos.cn
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Docs/admin-guide/cgroup-v2: document BPF scheduler callbacks for cpu.max and cpu.idle
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:08:32 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05fa2ecdf1468ca7454244941343626f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819031244.178638-2-luoliang@kylinos.cn>
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 11:12:43AM +0800, luoliang@kylinos.cn wrote:
> - This file affects only processes under the fair-class scheduler.
> + This file affects only processes under the fair-class scheduler and a BPF
> + scheduler with the ``cgroup_set_bandwidth`` callback depending on what
> + the callback actually does.
The "CPU Interface Files" preamble defines the categories that the
interface file entries refer back to and it only knows about
cgroup_set_weight:
* Processes under the fair-class scheduler
* Processes under a BPF scheduler with the ``cgroup_set_weight`` callback
* Everything else: ``SCHED_{FIFO,RR,DEADLINE}`` and processes under a BPF
scheduler without the ``cgroup_set_weight`` callback
With cpu.max, cpu.max.burst and cpu.idle now referring to
cgroup_set_bandwidth and cgroup_set_idle, the preamble no longer covers
the entries that follow it. Can you please update the preamble to match,
e.g. by making the bullets refer to the corresponding cgroup_set_*
callback, and resend?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 3:12 [PATCH 0/2] sched_ext: documentation fixes luoliang
2026-08-19 3:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] Docs/admin-guide/cgroup-v2: document BPF scheduler callbacks for cpu.max and cpu.idle luoliang
2026-08-19 20:08 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-08-20 2:01 ` luoliang
2026-08-20 2:37 ` [PATCH v2] " luoliang
2026-08-19 3:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Fix nonexistent field in sched-ext.rst example luoliang
2026-08-19 20:08 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05fa2ecdf1468ca7454244941343626f@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoliang@kylinos.cn \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.