From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
"honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com" <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>, "nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/i40e: replace SMP barrier with thread fence
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 12:09:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <061d231c5ff848a19be50a62aed44087@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210706065404.25137-3-joyce.kong@arm.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 2:54 PM
> To: Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>;
> ruifeng.wang@arm.com; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; nd@arm.com
> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] net/i40e: replace SMP barrier with thread fence
>
> Simply replace the SMP barrier with atomic thread fence for i40e hw ring sacn,
> if there is no synchronization point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index
> 9aaabfd92..86e2f083e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,8 @@ i40e_rx_scan_hw_ring(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
> I40E_RXD_QW1_STATUS_SHIFT;
> }
>
> - rte_smp_rmb();
> + /* This barrier is to order loads of different words in the descriptor */
> + rte_atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
Now for x86, you actually replace a compiler barrier with a memory fence, this may have potential performance impact which need additional resource to investigate
So there are 2 options:
1. if you want this patch be merged into DPDK 21.08, please change this for ARM only.
2. you can wait for our update for x86 but I guess it will miss 21.08.
What do you think?
Btw for patch 1/2, I think I can merge it independently right?
>
> /* Compute how many status bits were set */
> for (j = 0, nb_dd = 0; j < I40E_LOOK_AHEAD; j++) {
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-04 7:34 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/i40e: remove the SMP barrier in HW scanning func Joyce Kong
2021-06-04 16:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-06 14:17 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-06-06 18:33 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-07 14:55 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-06-07 21:36 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-15 6:30 ` Joyce Kong
2021-06-16 13:29 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-06-16 13:37 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-06-16 20:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-23 8:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: add logic of processing continuous DD bits for Arm Joyce Kong
2021-06-30 1:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-07-05 3:41 ` Joyce Kong
2021-07-06 6:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] fixes for i40e hw scan ring Joyce Kong
2021-07-06 6:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] net/i40e: add logic of processing continuous DD bits for Arm Joyce Kong
2021-07-09 3:05 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-07-06 6:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/i40e: replace SMP barrier with thread fence Joyce Kong
2021-07-08 12:09 ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2021-07-08 13:51 ` Lance Richardson
2021-07-08 14:26 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2021-07-08 14:44 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-07-13 0:46 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=061d231c5ff848a19be50a62aed44087@intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=joyce.kong@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.