From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 4.17.4 lockup
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:50:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <067e2d5d-1abf-efd4-cb50-992ba5ca6748@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOpV89jWhvAZtqOJnc0eXzRYiLF5pLWRcdb7-kKLigj4rQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/11/2018 10:29 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> I have seen it on machines with various amounts of cores and RAMs.
>> It triggers the fastest on 8 cores with 6GB RAM reliably.
> Here is the first kernel message.
This looks like random corruption again. It's probably a bogus 'struct
page' that fails the move_freepages() pfn_valid() checks. I'm too lazy
to go reproduce the likely stack trace (not sure why it didn't show up
on your screen), but this could just be another symptom of the same
issue that caused the TLB batching oops.
My money is on this being some kind of odd stack corruption, maybe
interrupt-induced, but that's a total guess at this point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-11 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-08 21:36 Kernel 4.17.4 lockup H.J. Lu
2018-07-09 14:54 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-09 23:02 ` H.J. Lu
2018-07-10 0:44 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-10 2:14 ` H.J. Lu
2018-07-10 3:47 ` Dave Hansen
[not found] ` <CAMe9rOrHowBX06nihdRRmEqhV8v7cs+PwVY7JYQFpUFOnHC71A@mail.gmail.com>
2018-07-11 15:13 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-11 15:40 ` H.J. Lu
2018-07-11 16:24 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-11 16:29 ` H.J. Lu
2018-07-11 16:49 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-11 16:53 ` H.J. Lu
[not found] ` <CAMe9rOpV89jWhvAZtqOJnc0eXzRYiLF5pLWRcdb7-kKLigj4rQ@mail.gmail.com>
2018-07-11 17:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-11 17:43 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-11 17:50 ` H.J. Lu
2018-07-11 17:50 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-07-11 18:31 ` Dave Jones
2018-07-11 23:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-11 23:14 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-12 14:44 ` H.J. Lu
2018-07-12 23:28 ` H.J. Lu
2018-07-14 2:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-16 16:05 ` H.J. Lu
2018-07-20 21:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-23 14:51 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=067e2d5d-1abf-efd4-cb50-992ba5ca6748@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.