From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Venefax" Subject: RE: Windows SMP Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:36:56 -0500 Message-ID: <069e01c96b55$3c834d80$b589e880$@com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-us List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: 'Keir Fraser' , 'Andrew Lyon' Cc: 'James Harper' , 'Dirk Utterback' , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Dear Gentlemen I have a machine with Intel 7350, 4 quad core. I can test since I have two virtual machines with 8 vcpus, showing a gross overhead that makes them unsuited for business. I use SLES 10 SP2, and I don't know how to apply the patch, but if somebody can log in and apply it, we can see the results immediately. The issue is affecting me directly. My two VM's have a VOIP application, very intensive in network and CPU usage. Federico -----Original Message----- From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 5:10 AM To: Andrew Lyon Cc: Venefax; James Harper; Dirk Utterback; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Windows SMP On 31/12/2008 10:08, "Andrew Lyon" wrote: > > Thanks Keir, I added a couple of printk's as you suggested and I can > now see if the feature is supported: > > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz = (XEN) APIC Access > virtualized > Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz = (XEN) APIC Access emulated > > I didnt expect my Xeon system to support it, I've read some pdf's > about Intel virtualizaton features and they seemed to suggest it was a > new feature on 7xxx Xeons. > > The results fit the performance I've seen, a windows xp 32 bit hvm > with 2 cpu's runs a lot faster on the Xeon 2.5 than on the Core 2.4. I think it is probably worth printing out. I'll add a patch to xen-unstable. Thanks, Keir