All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge Kuznetsov" <serge@wcom.ca>
To: "Joseph D. Wagner" <wagnerjd@prodigy.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is this going to be true ?
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:18:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <075101c2a139$46f7adc0$9c094d8e@wcom.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 001801c2a0a9$02613f40$2e863841@joe

> 1) Future development of the Windows operating system or some of its
> components will be *BSD based.  The Microsoft Corporation will never touch
> Linux.  Period.  The lawyers simply wouldn't allow it.  The lawyers think of
> GNU GPL as an infectious disease, and so anything Linux is out of the
> question.  The BSD license is far more favorable to proprietary development,
> since it allows you to close off the source.  Hence, assimilating a *BSD
> structure, component, or piece of code is far more likely.

BTW, It explains me why M$ made server side CLI for FreeBSD, not Linux.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-12-11 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-10 21:03 Alteon AceNIC Coper Seen as Fibre ? (and incorrect settings) Stephan van Hienen
2002-12-10 21:16 ` Is this going to be true ? Serge Kuznetsov
2002-12-10 22:14   ` Herman Oosthuysen
2002-12-10 22:21     ` Serge Kuznetsov
2002-12-11  0:33       ` Michael Melanson
2002-12-11  0:55         ` David Schwartz
2002-12-11  1:04           ` Larry McVoy
2002-12-11 23:47     ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-12-11  0:05   ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-11  1:08     ` Herman Oosthuysen
2002-12-11 15:55       ` Måns Rullgård
2002-12-11 16:33         ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-12-12  0:01           ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-12-12  3:16             ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-12-12  3:39               ` Mark Hamblin
2002-12-13  9:18               ` David Schwartz
2002-12-11 23:57         ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-12-12  9:22           ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2002-12-12 14:15           ` Adam H. Pendleton
2002-12-12 21:24           ` Kjartan Maraas
2002-12-12  9:35         ` Helge Hafting
2002-12-11 13:41     ` Rik van Riel
2002-12-11 14:17       ` Måns Rullgård
2002-12-11 17:06     ` Serge Kuznetsov
2002-12-11 17:26       ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-12-11 22:01         ` john slee
2002-12-12 10:13           ` Måns Rullgård
2002-12-12 10:16         ` Måns Rullgård
2002-12-12 11:12           ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-12-12 13:19             ` Billy Harvey
2002-12-12 13:30               ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-12-13 10:56                 ` szonyi calin
2002-12-13 13:19                   ` Billy Harvey
2002-12-11 17:12     ` Serge Kuznetsov
2002-12-11 17:21       ` Alvaro Lopes
2002-12-12  6:50         ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-11 17:29       ` Dave Jones
2002-12-11 17:18     ` Serge Kuznetsov [this message]
2002-12-11 13:38   ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-12-11 16:19     ` Alan Cox
2002-12-10 21:41 ` Alteon AceNIC Coper Seen as Fibre ? (and incorrect settings) Eric Weigle
2002-12-12 22:00 ` Jes Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='075101c2a139$46f7adc0$9c094d8e@wcom.ca' \
    --to=serge@wcom.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wagnerjd@prodigy.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.