From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f198.google.com (mail-pf0-f198.google.com [209.85.192.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26616B0388 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:29:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf0-f198.google.com with SMTP id x66so69699711pfb.2 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:29:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from out4434.biz.mail.alibaba.com (out4434.biz.mail.alibaba.com. [47.88.44.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l5si1797611pgh.233.2017.03.01.19.29.06 for ; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:29:07 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: "Hillf Danton" From: "Hillf Danton" References: <20170228214007.5621-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <20170228214007.5621-5-hannes@cmpxchg.org> In-Reply-To: <20170228214007.5621-5-hannes@cmpxchg.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm: remove unnecessary reclaimability check from NUMA balancing target Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 11:28:49 +0800 Message-ID: <077f01d29305$1c4e2a90$54ea7fb0$@alibaba-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: zh-cn Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: 'Johannes Weiner' , 'Andrew Morton' Cc: 'Jia He' , 'Michal Hocko' , 'Mel Gorman' , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com On March 01, 2017 5:40 AM Johannes Weiner wrote: > > NUMA balancing already checks the watermarks of the target node to > decide whether it's a suitable balancing target. Whether the node is > reclaimable or not is irrelevant when we don't intend to reclaim. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner > --- Acked-by: Hillf Danton -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753867AbdCBDjq (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:39:46 -0500 Received: from out4435.biz.mail.alibaba.com ([47.88.44.35]:38944 "EHLO out4435.biz.mail.alibaba.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753075AbdCBDjp (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:39:45 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R201e4;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e02c03303;MF=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=8;SC=85;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.7jkVQRG_1488425329; Reply-To: "Hillf Danton" From: "Hillf Danton" To: "'Johannes Weiner'" , "'Andrew Morton'" Cc: "'Jia He'" , "'Michal Hocko'" , "'Mel Gorman'" , , , References: <20170228214007.5621-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <20170228214007.5621-5-hannes@cmpxchg.org> In-Reply-To: <20170228214007.5621-5-hannes@cmpxchg.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm: remove unnecessary reclaimability check from NUMA balancing target Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 11:28:49 +0800 Message-ID: <077f01d29305$1c4e2a90$54ea7fb0$@alibaba-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGushofxnzLnyVlk/YQjboYC5yEOwHv/9wtobklmtA= Content-Language: zh-cn Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On March 01, 2017 5:40 AM Johannes Weiner wrote: > > NUMA balancing already checks the watermarks of the target node to > decide whether it's a suitable balancing target. Whether the node is > reclaimable or not is irrelevant when we don't intend to reclaim. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner > --- Acked-by: Hillf Danton