From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] block/bdev: Annotate the blk_holder_ops callback invocations
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 16:44:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08078df0-d3e6-4860-b22b-937035d45857@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNPJPz7qruFw8S=4qoF32snPW-RYrd_BZK6skR_y86CUZg@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/10/26 3:43 PM, Marco Elver wrote:
> Can you retry? Thanks!
Thanks, this works much better! However, I think there is still an issue
with this new version: no compiler warning is emitted if one function
pointer is assigned to another function pointer and the lock context
annotations of the two pointers differ.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-10 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 18:39 [PATCH v3 00/12] Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] block: Annotate the queue limits functions Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] block/bdev: Annotate the blk_holder_ops callback invocations Bart Van Assche
2026-04-09 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-09 13:27 ` Marco Elver
2026-04-10 17:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-10 22:43 ` Marco Elver
2026-04-10 23:44 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2026-04-13 6:00 ` Marco Elver
2026-04-13 16:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-13 20:03 ` Marco Elver
2026-05-11 6:00 ` Marco Elver
2026-05-11 16:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-05-11 18:15 ` Marco Elver
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] block/cgroup: Split blkg_conf_prep() Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] block/cgroup: Split blkg_conf_exit() Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] block/cgroup: Inline blkg_conf_{open,close}_bdev_frozen() Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] block/crypto: Annotate the crypto functions Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] block/blk-iocost: Add lock context annotations Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] block/blk-mq-debugfs: Improve " Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] block/blk-zoned: Refactor blkdev_zone_mgmt_ioctl() Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] block/kyber: Make the lock context annotations compatible with Clang Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] block/mq-deadline: " Bart Van Assche
2026-04-02 18:39 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] block: Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-04-03 0:19 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] " Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08078df0-d3e6-4860-b22b-937035d45857@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.