From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: Dierk Modrow <dierk.modrow@sew-eurodrive.de>, iwd@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] src/station.c: fix of SEGV in station_roam_scan_notify when performing repeated roam scan at legacy roaming after ft_auth-/ft_reassoc-timeout when using mwifiex / NXP 88W9098 driver
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 06:37:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <086d4214-d1b0-4ef4-9cdb-6bc94d3ed07d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260713113506.1081-2-dierk.modrow@sew-eurodrive.de>
Hi Dierk,
On 7/13/26 4:35 AM, Dierk Modrow wrote:
> From: DEMODDIE <dierk.modrow@sew-eurodrive.de>
>
> ---
> src/station.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/station.c b/src/station.c
> index 8fcf8c70..077e510e 100644
> --- a/src/station.c
> +++ b/src/station.c
> @@ -2253,7 +2253,7 @@ static bool station_can_fast_transition(struct station *station,
> {
> uint16_t mdid;
>
> - if (!hs->mde)
> + if (!hs || !hs->mde)
> return false;
>
> if (ie_parse_mobility_domain_from_data(hs->mde, hs->mde[1] + 2,
> @@ -2917,7 +2917,7 @@ static bool station_roam_scan_notify(int err, struct l_queue *bss_list,
>
> orig_security = network_get_security(network);
>
> - if (hs->mde)
> + if (hs && hs->mde)
> ie_parse_mobility_domain_from_data(hs->mde, hs->mde[1] + 2,
> &mdid, NULL, NULL);
>
> @@ -2930,7 +2930,7 @@ static bool station_roam_scan_notify(int err, struct l_queue *bss_list,
> if (bss && !station->ap_directed_roaming) {
> double cur_bss_rank = bss->rank;
>
> - if (hs->mde && bss->mde_present && l_get_le16(bss->mde) == mdid)
> + if (hs && hs->mde && bss->mde_present && l_get_le16(bss->mde) == mdid)
> cur_bss_rank *= RANK_FT_FACTOR;
>
> cur_bss_group_rank = evaluate_bss_group_rank(bss->addr,
> @@ -2967,8 +2967,8 @@ static bool station_roam_scan_notify(int err, struct l_queue *bss_list,
> goto next;
>
> /* Skip result if it is not part of the ESS */
> - if (bss->ssid_len != hs->ssid_len ||
> - memcmp(bss->ssid, hs->ssid, hs->ssid_len))
> + if (hs && (bss->ssid_len != hs->ssid_len ||
> + memcmp(bss->ssid, hs->ssid, hs->ssid_len)))
> goto next;
>
> if (scan_bss_get_security(bss, &security) < 0)
> @@ -2986,7 +2986,7 @@ static bool station_roam_scan_notify(int err, struct l_queue *bss_list,
>
> rank = bss->rank;
>
> - if (hs->mde && bss->mde_present && l_get_le16(bss->mde) == mdid)
> + if (hs && hs->mde && bss->mde_present && l_get_le16(bss->mde) == mdid)
> rank *= RANK_FT_FACTOR;
>
> group_rank = evaluate_bss_group_rank(bss->addr, bss->frequency,
> --
> 2.53.0.windows.2
>
Are you sure you're not looking in the wrong place? You mention ft_auth
and ft_associate, but the behavior differs significantly if there's a
timeout:
- If ft_auth times out IWD will try another BSS and the handshake is
preserved.
- If ft_reassoc times out the kernel forces a disconnect, destroying the
handshake
That said I'm not sure how we can get into station_roam_scan_notify
without a handshake... If we ever disconnect the scan callback should be
canceled, even if its still in-flight ELL will null out the callback, we
should just never get there.
Is there a bug causing the callback to get called? (maybe?) but if so
that's where we should fix this, not checking if the handshake exists
when it always should. An L_WARN_ON check might be appropriate at the
top level to both prevent a hard crash and provide a warning that there
is a bug.
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-13 11:35 [PATCH 1/2] src/eapol.c: fix of SEGV in eapol_rx_packets at receipt of EAPOL M1 msg at legacy roaming after ft_auth-/ft_reassoc-timeout when using mwifiex / NXP 88W9098 driver Dierk Modrow
2026-07-13 11:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] src/station.c: fix of SEGV in station_roam_scan_notify when performing repeated roam scan " Dierk Modrow
2026-07-14 13:37 ` James Prestwood [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-07-13 11:29 [PATCH 1/2] src/eapol.c: fix of SEGV in eapol_rx_packets at receipt of EAPOL M1 msg " Dierk Modrow
2026-07-13 11:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] src/station.c: fix of SEGV in station_roam_scan_notify when performing repeated roam scan " Dierk Modrow
2026-07-13 11:22 [PATCH 1/2] src/eapol.c: fix of SEGV in eapol_rx_packets at receipt of EAPOL M1 msg " Dierk Modrow
2026-07-13 11:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] src/station.c: fix of SEGV in station_roam_scan_notify when performing repeated roam scan " Dierk Modrow
2026-07-08 15:22 [PATCH] src/eapol.c: fix of SEGV in eapol_rx_packets at receipt of EAPOL M1 msg " Dierk Modrow
2026-07-08 15:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] src/station.c: fix of SEGV in station_roam_scan_notify when performing repeated roam scan " Dierk Modrow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=086d4214-d1b0-4ef4-9cdb-6bc94d3ed07d@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=dierk.modrow@sew-eurodrive.de \
--cc=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.