From: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@connecttech.com>
To: "'Chase Venters'" <chase.venters@clientec.com>
Cc: "'Krzysztof Halasa'" <khc@pm.waw.pl>, <ellis@spinics.net>,
"'Willy Tarreau'" <w@1wt.eu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: bogofilter ate 3/5
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 13:35:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08b101c6d2a4$04f74020$294b82ce@stuartm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609070915580.31500@turbotaz.ourhouse>
From: Chase Venters [mailto:chase.venters@clientec.com]
> highly ironic that spam blocker services tell you not to use certain
> techniques (autoresponders, bounce messages) that are not only
> commonplace, but precedented and even mandated by RFC on the
> grounds that
> they may cause you to be blocked. Then they move on to
> criticize anti-spam
> techniques that fall in these domains with one of their
> subpoints saying
> 'they can cause you to miss legitimate mail!'
>
> Guess what: so does indiscriminately blocking people whose
> sites don't bow
> down to your unreasonable demands, especially when their
> behavior (say,
> sending bounce messages) is described in the official protocol
> documentation.
I will assume you are referring to SpamCop. Their service does not
behave the way you think it does:
http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?autocom=custom&page=whatis
Read the paragraph: "SpamCop works exactly like the credit reporting
agencies..."
..Stu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-07 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-06 5:37 bogofilter ate 3/5 Rick Ellis
2006-09-06 18:00 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-06 18:04 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-06 18:56 ` ellis
2006-09-06 19:15 ` Chase Venters
2006-09-06 20:56 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-09-06 22:05 ` Chase Venters
2006-09-07 11:55 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-09-07 13:46 ` Chase Venters
2006-09-07 22:33 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-09-07 22:37 ` Chase Venters
2006-09-07 22:58 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-09-07 23:02 ` Matti Aarnio
2006-09-07 13:58 ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-07 14:01 ` [OT] " Chase Venters
2006-09-07 14:27 ` Chase Venters
2006-09-07 17:35 ` Stuart MacDonald [this message]
2006-09-07 18:25 ` Chase Venters
2006-09-07 21:05 ` Stuart MacDonald
2006-09-07 9:52 ` Matti Aarnio
2006-09-06 20:13 ` Willy Tarreau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-05 23:57 [RFC 0/5] dio: clean up completion phase of direct_io_worker() Zach Brown
2006-09-06 4:35 ` bogofilter ate 3/5 Zach Brown
2006-09-06 5:00 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-09-06 7:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-09-08 22:16 ` Matthias Andree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='08b101c6d2a4$04f74020$294b82ce@stuartm' \
--to=stuartm@connecttech.com \
--cc=chase.venters@clientec.com \
--cc=ellis@spinics.net \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.