From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71EEC001B0 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 20:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231297AbjHGULt (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:11:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231382AbjHGULp (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:11:45 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBA210C1 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2023 13:11:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1691439104; x=1722975104; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x8cR585u3FQ3zMVGSS9wRn+Vlf2HCVEnerMfJWVDqo8=; b=AzB4T0xEYiz7XgC9Z4XOyIbNv15wyU/Rk8tTSnAyX46dWp1cvnOn5PSA n54ZlX+4c0efycK+hEgHw72G3cS6raUA+pjOk3+//syAuEmmkfHk6u4xx eGFJwKaIXIWF8Pglqe3HgfCg2RC2681I8ngbgX3KZzpA96uqAZLB4veb0 Tvn0hTC6zUSytsuis/U3KU2IeE1kJrX2L8Rvoe6hTWX2hBuEqajZDofu+ LwDogszPoNgpczzUnznQz4VTetuxUcY6xhewS3nG6JK9ATlDanpZ33SBH Pnh1c/hf0OSLddtdD2uW7aymiWlRBS8Ou3tex5pGOcI0tnDemjMfInDT1 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10795"; a="374314684" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,262,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="374314684" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2023 13:11:43 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10795"; a="904935533" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,262,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="904935533" Received: from nyamoah-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.249.113]) ([10.212.249.113]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2023 13:11:43 -0700 Message-ID: <09100858-3be2-a9f2-e0af-b6cad67d760b@intel.com> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 13:11:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [patch V3 26/60] x86/apic/32: Decrapify the def_bigsmp mechanism Content-Language: en-US To: Thomas Gleixner , LKML Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andrew Cooper , Tom Lendacky , Paolo Bonzini , Wei Liu , Arjan van de Ven , Juergen Gross , Michael Kelley , Peter Keresztes Schmidt , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" References: <20230801103042.936020332@linutronix.de> <20230801103816.584394452@linutronix.de> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20230801103816.584394452@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/1/23 03:47, Thomas Gleixner wrote: ... > -void __init default_setup_apic_routing(void) > +void __init x86_32_probe_bigsmp_early(void) > { > - int version = boot_cpu_apic_version; > + if (nr_cpu_ids <= 8 || xen_pv_domain()) > + return; ... > +void __init default_setup_apic_routing(void) > +{ > + if (nr_cpu_ids >= 8 && !xen_pv_domain()) > + apic_bigsmp_force(); I thought bigsmp didn't come into play until 9 or more CPUs. Won't this do apic_bigsmp_force() at nr_cpu_ids==8? Should this be: if (nr_cpu_ids > 8 && !xen_pv_domain()) apic_bigsmp_force(); ?