From: Mohan Kumar D <mkumard@nvidia.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
vkoul@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: Linux 6.14-rc2
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:03:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a7febaa-3d68-4545-9f68-ffda8da2f967@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <038652fa-ddac-4c6f-9dfa-50d981199177@roeck-us.net>
On 10-02-2025 09:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 01:00:27PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> It's Sunday afternoon, and I'm releasing the usual regularly scheduled
>> release candidate while the rest of the US is getting ready for the
>> biggest day in TV commercials interrupted by some kind of lawn bowling
>> tournament.
>>
>> With 6.14 being a fairly small release, rc2 follows suit. It's not the
>> smallest rc2 we've had in the 6.x series, but it's definitely on the
>> smaller side.
>>
>> Nothing particularly odd stands out. The diffstat is a bit unusual
>> just because one of the bigger areas of change was some s390 kvm
>> cleanups. So the fact that s390 accounts for about a third of the
>> overall patch is certainly not very common, but it's just a result of
>> some code movement and the fact that most of the rest of rc2 really is
>> just very small fixes.
>>
>> We have a similar pattern (on a much smaller scale) wrt selftests: the
>> tests show up in the diffstat, but it's due to trivial small fixes
>> that then triggered a whole new self test to be written.
>>
>> Anyway, it all looks fine, please give it a try,
>>
> Build results:
> total: 161 pass: 159 fail: 2
> Failed builds:
> i386:allyesconfig
> i386:allmodconfig
> Qemu test results:
> total: 544 pass: 544 fail: 0
> Unit test results:
> pass: 487271 fail: 0
>
> The i386 build failure is still
>
> x86_64-linux-ld: drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.o: in function `tegra_adma_probe':
> tegra210-adma.c:(.text+0x1322): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
>
> The failure is triggered by commit 68811c928f88 ("dmaengine: tegra210-adma:
> Support channel page"). A fix has been submitted a while ago. See [1].
> It hasn't been applied to linux-next. I don't know the status.
> Copying those involved for feedback.
>
> Guenter
Hi, I have pushed the series
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d644a35e-7dfd-4eb0-a7c3-8dae96e09657@nvidia.com/
to fix this issue couple of days back, still waiting to get the change
applied. Need someone to help here.
>
> ---
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250201171441.407b91cb@kernel.org/T/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-09 21:00 Linux 6.14-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2025-02-10 4:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-02-10 4:33 ` Mohan Kumar D [this message]
2025-02-10 10:47 ` Luna Jernberg
2025-02-12 19:14 ` Frank Scheiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a7febaa-3d68-4545-9f68-ffda8da2f967@nvidia.com \
--to=mkumard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.