From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul B. Henson" Subject: Re: dm-cache questions Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:08:05 -0800 Message-ID: <0aea01cef615$d688f8d0$839aea70$@acm.org> References: <093f01cef54a$fdf044d0$f9d0ce70$@acm.org> <20131210095019.GB32555@debian> <0a9401cef5eb$7e32a110$7a97e330$@acm.org> <20131211010337.GB4894@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131211010337.GB4894@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> Content-Language: en-us List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: 'Alasdair G Kergon' Cc: 'device-mapper development' List-Id: dm-devel.ids > From: Alasdair G Kergon [mailto:agk@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 5:04 PM > > We send them to mainline and stable then it is up to the distributions > concerned to choose to apply them. I meant more whether they'd get applied to the LTS kernel upstream; eg, show up in a minor patch to 3.10 from kernel.org. > Various aspects of the design are being debated. Expect to see progress > to start to appear on lvm-devel over the next few weeks. We're > hopeful we'll have something that's beginning to be useful in January. Cool, thanks for the info. I'll start lurking on that list and see what happens :).