From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<tglx@kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<david.kaplan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] x86/microcode: Refactor NMI-based rendezvous mechanism to stop-machine
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 23:02:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0aed3e47-1753-4841-982b-864ea8f2d805@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809020558.GCanfghiQiGX33XWp4@fat_crate.local>
On 8/8/2026 7:05 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Sashiko is pointing to a bunch of issues:
>
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260331014251.86353-3-chang.seok.bae%40intel.com
Will address on my next revision.
Thanks,
Chang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 1:42 [PATCH v2 00/11] x86/microcode: Refactor NMI-based rendezvous mechanism to stop-machine Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] stop_machine: Clarify @cpus == NULL semantics Chang S. Bae
2026-07-23 4:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 02/11] stop_machine: Accumulate error code rather than overwrite Chang S. Bae
2026-08-09 2:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-08-11 6:02 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] stop_machine: Refactor multi-CPU stop glue code Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] stop_machine: Add NMI-based execution path Chang S. Bae
2026-04-01 2:57 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] stop_machine: Introduce stop_machine_nmi_cpuslocked() Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/apic: Implement self-NMI support Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/nmi: Support NMI stop-machine handler Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/microcode: Distinguish NMI control path on stop-machine callback Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/microcode: Use stop-machine NMI facility Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/nmi: Simplify offline microcode handler invocation Chang S. Bae
2026-03-31 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] x86/microcode: Remove microcode_nmi_handler_enable Chang S. Bae
2026-08-09 2:05 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] x86/microcode: Refactor NMI-based rendezvous mechanism to stop-machine Borislav Petkov
2026-08-11 6:02 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0aed3e47-1753-4841-982b-864ea8f2d805@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.