From: "shekhar, chandra" <x0044955@ti.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: me@felipebalbi.com, ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-omap: Fix standard and fast mode prescalers
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:16:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b7d01c9485e$bca27960$LocalHost@wipultra806> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20081114214635.GC31944@frodo
I had tested twl4030 at 3.4 Mbps couple of months back and it was working fine
with current settings. It wasn't a rigorous testing though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Felipe Balbi" <me@felipebalbi.com>
To: "David Brownell" <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: <me@felipebalbi.com>; <ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com>;
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-omap: Fix standard and fast mode prescalers
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:08:10PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> On Friday 14 November 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:45:30AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> > > And should it let at least some boards talk to their
>> > > TWL chips at 3.4 MBit/sec (top speed for standard
>> > > highspeed I2C) instead of 2.6 Mbit/sec (pokey slow)?
>> > > I've always wondered why all the boards configured
>> > > those links to be seemingly slower than allowed ...
>> >
>> > I think it came from board-3430sdp.c
>>
>> So you're saying there was *never* a need for that slowdown,
>> and everyone was just copying an existing buglet?
>>
>> I know I didn't make time to test whether faster speeds
>> would work ... but had expected there was a reason, at
>> some point, for that detuning.
>
> There was a need. But I think it should be fixed by now. I shall test
> tw5030 with 3.4Mbit/sec on monday. Will report.
>
> --
> balbi
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-17 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-14 8:41 [PATCH] i2c: i2c-omap: Fix standard and fast mode prescalers ext-eero.nurkkala
2008-11-14 19:45 ` David Brownell
2008-11-14 20:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-11-14 20:08 ` David Brownell
2008-11-14 21:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2008-11-17 2:46 ` shekhar, chandra [this message]
2008-11-18 5:36 ` David Brownell
2008-11-14 20:38 ` Steve Sakoman
2008-11-19 12:07 ` Eero Nurkkala
2008-11-21 22:08 ` Tony Lindgren
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-13 6:06 Eero Nurkkala
2009-01-23 2:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-11-26 13:44 ext-eero.nurkkala
2008-11-27 8:38 ` Eero Nurkkala
2009-01-08 13:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-01-09 20:27 ` Kainan Cha
2009-01-12 6:29 ` Eero Nurkkala
2008-11-25 6:56 ext-eero.nurkkala
2008-11-11 6:52 ext-eero.nurkkala
2008-11-11 13:21 ` shekhar, chandra
2008-11-10 10:46 ext-eero.nurkkala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='0b7d01c9485e$bca27960$LocalHost@wipultra806' \
--to=x0044955@ti.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=ext-eero.nurkkala@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.