From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B5DC433FE for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA7022519 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ACA7022519 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236C74B1F5; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:24:23 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@redhat.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W+ansMRQbTIK; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:24:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EE04B15F; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:24:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED8C4B147 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:24:21 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYdR+M7s26Gk for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:24:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FA54B11F for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:24:19 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1607077459; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2T15ek84GRYZBFIB7crwXKiwkKfTgxR0/uZEpJtiF7w=; b=bfIHGsbHkh52/70HynzLze12z7NeTwS2b5kRUVJ1m24iMymYuWhlyWetHmJifSs/aEZId3 1uIMt4wfFXac2EDUyewo4PZu1AqOc4iplaFohYcu61Fehu194unNDP3XLXzObO9ZC8Al60 DwUFxFt0UKMLn+V1325aoOukKXX2RXo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-481-EHJ7jY99MrmUOFed-1HElg-1; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 05:24:13 -0500 X-MC-Unique: EHJ7jY99MrmUOFed-1HElg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4C8180A087; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.89] (ovpn-112-89.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.89]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A2C620D7; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Jean-Philippe Brucker References: <20201118112151.25412-8-eric.auger@redhat.com> <1606829590-25924-1-git-send-email-wangxingang5@huawei.com> <2e69adf5-8207-64f7-fa8e-9f2bd3a3c4e3@redhat.com> <20201204095338.GA1912466@myrica> <2de03a797517452cbfeab022e12612b7@huawei.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: <0bf50dd6-ef3c-7aba-cbc1-1c2e17088470@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:23:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2de03a797517452cbfeab022e12612b7@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Cc: Xieyingtai , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , wangxingang , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "maz@kernel.org" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "vivek.gautam@arm.com" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , qubingbing , "Zengtao \(B\)" , "zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > Hi Jean, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@linaro.org] >> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 >> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi >> Cc: Auger Eric ; wangxingang >> ; Xieyingtai ; >> kvm@vger.kernel.org; maz@kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org; will@kernel.org; >> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> vivek.gautam@arm.com; alex.williamson@redhat.com; >> zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; >> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; Zengtao (B) >> ; qubingbing >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with >> unmanaged ASIDs >> >> Hi Shameer, >> >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, >>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related >> patches >>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of >> Eric's series? >>> Please share your thoughts. >> >> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches >> based on mainline? > > Yes. > > The uacce-devel branches from >> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment >> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch >> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) > > Thanks. > > Hi Eric, > > Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense > to rebase on top of either of those? > > From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > Shameer > >> Thanks, >> Jean > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1A8C4361A for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80CEE2251D for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 80CEE2251D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333D487309; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from fraxinus.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zt9kvQKxrokM; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by fraxinus.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF468723E; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D312C0FA8; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463B5C013B for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DBD87C4C for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajQxouEDtW6y for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7017387C4B for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1607077457; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2T15ek84GRYZBFIB7crwXKiwkKfTgxR0/uZEpJtiF7w=; b=Ydbx++idU/Z3ChVoXoEGyUgkbbUrU0cwbHSjSj7sAXch2B3R65RkucbTfv9AWoFgaZjA25 6mbBqQ8Df7VcnhH/nh9rDS2q0FyKSr8uzZwZAHUi3u57pCjEyPnoBp4RBEbaOQuArBLyoC v6Zoi0f7AVYZQeGkTj0VIjPd/h57bm8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-481-EHJ7jY99MrmUOFed-1HElg-1; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 05:24:13 -0500 X-MC-Unique: EHJ7jY99MrmUOFed-1HElg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4C8180A087; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.89] (ovpn-112-89.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.89]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A2C620D7; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Jean-Philippe Brucker References: <20201118112151.25412-8-eric.auger@redhat.com> <1606829590-25924-1-git-send-email-wangxingang5@huawei.com> <2e69adf5-8207-64f7-fa8e-9f2bd3a3c4e3@redhat.com> <20201204095338.GA1912466@myrica> <2de03a797517452cbfeab022e12612b7@huawei.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: <0bf50dd6-ef3c-7aba-cbc1-1c2e17088470@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:23:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2de03a797517452cbfeab022e12612b7@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Cc: Xieyingtai , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , wangxingang , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "maz@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "vivek.gautam@arm.com" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , qubingbing , "Zengtao \(B\)" , "zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > Hi Jean, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@linaro.org] >> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 >> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi >> Cc: Auger Eric ; wangxingang >> ; Xieyingtai ; >> kvm@vger.kernel.org; maz@kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org; will@kernel.org; >> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> vivek.gautam@arm.com; alex.williamson@redhat.com; >> zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; >> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; Zengtao (B) >> ; qubingbing >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with >> unmanaged ASIDs >> >> Hi Shameer, >> >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, >>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related >> patches >>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of >> Eric's series? >>> Please share your thoughts. >> >> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches >> based on mainline? > > Yes. > > The uacce-devel branches from >> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment >> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch >> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) > > Thanks. > > Hi Eric, > > Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense > to rebase on top of either of those? > > From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > Shameer > >> Thanks, >> Jean > _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C994C4361A for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401F422518 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729861AbgLDKZq (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:25:46 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:27470 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729852AbgLDKZp (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 05:25:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1607077458; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2T15ek84GRYZBFIB7crwXKiwkKfTgxR0/uZEpJtiF7w=; b=SLloYKDdYp+CyHGbNW1sCRZTqmqcoNANfgfQiNf33KX/U9SJJ8FWt4gAsaCyi0OlECXUTh tnCg9VcF8JPH62IgEFAKiwfC2E+lG83cf2fvTO0Bs47rSGm6LuOzONSYQHiuBTxKn7uqCA vxpNO48A3DuXVYqUtyffL+o6tdp4hOg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-481-EHJ7jY99MrmUOFed-1HElg-1; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 05:24:13 -0500 X-MC-Unique: EHJ7jY99MrmUOFed-1HElg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4C8180A087; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.89] (ovpn-112-89.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.89]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A2C620D7; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Jean-Philippe Brucker Cc: wangxingang , Xieyingtai , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "maz@kernel.org" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "vivek.gautam@arm.com" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , "zhangfei.gao@linaro.org" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" , "Zengtao (B)" , qubingbing References: <20201118112151.25412-8-eric.auger@redhat.com> <1606829590-25924-1-git-send-email-wangxingang5@huawei.com> <2e69adf5-8207-64f7-fa8e-9f2bd3a3c4e3@redhat.com> <20201204095338.GA1912466@myrica> <2de03a797517452cbfeab022e12612b7@huawei.com> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: <0bf50dd6-ef3c-7aba-cbc1-1c2e17088470@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:23:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2de03a797517452cbfeab022e12612b7@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > Hi Jean, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@linaro.org] >> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 >> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi >> Cc: Auger Eric ; wangxingang >> ; Xieyingtai ; >> kvm@vger.kernel.org; maz@kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org; will@kernel.org; >> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >> vivek.gautam@arm.com; alex.williamson@redhat.com; >> zhangfei.gao@linaro.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; >> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger.pro@gmail.com; Zengtao (B) >> ; qubingbing >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with >> unmanaged ASIDs >> >> Hi Shameer, >> >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, >>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related >> patches >>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of >> Eric's series? >>> Please share your thoughts. >> >> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches >> based on mainline? > > Yes. > > The uacce-devel branches from >> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment >> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch >> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) > > Thanks. > > Hi Eric, > > Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense > to rebase on top of either of those? > > From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > Shameer > >> Thanks, >> Jean >