From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control EFLAGS.IF
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:34:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d893664-ff8d-83ed-e9be-441b45992f68@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211213104634.199141-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
On 12/13/21 11:46, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Fix a corner case in which L1 hypervisor intercepts interrupts (INTERCEPT_INTR)
> and either doesn't use virtual interrupt masking (V_INTR_MASKING) or
> enters a nested guest with EFLAGS.IF disabled prior to the entry.
>
> In this case, despite the fact that L1 intercepts the interrupts,
> KVM still needs to set up an interrupt window to wait before it
> can deliver INTR vmexit.
>
> Currently instead, the KVM enters an endless loop of 'req_immediate_exit'.
>
> Note that on VMX this case is impossible as there is only
> 'vmexit on external interrupts' execution control which either set,
> in which case both host and guest's EFLAGS.IF
> is ignored, or clear, in which case no VMexit is delivered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index e57e6857e0630..c9668a3b51011 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -3372,17 +3372,21 @@ bool svm_interrupt_blocked(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static int svm_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool for_injection)
> {
> struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> + bool blocked;
> +
> if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> + blocked = svm_interrupt_blocked(vcpu);
> +
> /*
> * An IRQ must not be injected into L2 if it's supposed to VM-Exit,
> * e.g. if the IRQ arrived asynchronously after checking nested events.
> */
> if (for_injection && is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_exit_on_intr(svm))
> - return -EBUSY;
> -
> - return !svm_interrupt_blocked(vcpu);
> + return !blocked ? -EBUSY : 0;
> + else
> + return !blocked;
> }
>
> static void svm_enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
Right, another case is when CLGI is not trapped and the guest therefore
runs with GIF=0. I think that means that a similar change has to be
done in all the *_allowed functions.
I would write it as
if (svm->nested.nested_run_pending)
return -EBUSY;
if (svm_interrupt_blocked(vcpu))
return 0;
/*
* An IRQ must not be injected into L2 if it's supposed to VM-Exit,
* e.g. if the IRQ arrived asynchronously after checking nested events.
*/
if (for_injection && is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_exit_on_intr(svm))
return -EBUSY;
return 1;
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-13 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-13 10:46 [PATCH v2 0/5] RFC: KVM: SVM: Allow L1's AVIC to co-exist with nesting Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control EFLAGS.IF Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 11:34 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-12-13 13:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 13:29 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 10:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 17:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: SVM: fix race between interrupt delivery and AVIC inhibition Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 11:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-05 12:15 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-07 15:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-07 23:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-10 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: don't touch irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv when inhibiting it Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-04 22:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-05 10:56 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-13 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-05 21:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-06 8:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-06 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d893664-ff8d-83ed-e9be-441b45992f68@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.