From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CB31CD1F for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 19:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752522392; cv=none; b=fQgYXhX9kEOWK143jOYMrexovz2YgbYDXV3roNTxDRA7YVMzNhC813/nuabRX3x9z0whR4zbpTzb4wvLopO6o6KEQTuLWHMQSD31Hev+Jup0HcsegM6JVHthJ2gleG8PeKCvu+v0DzGIKk5Oxsm5fKGiHjyTzEBrPRBfgS3TXiE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752522392; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vQOqi9iZD6wccfid1TBvWsr440HmgFH1TPenVglGRzM=; h=From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=oYCgedbEVchg4f+Lko8wT4ulCm29y4eNShtuXrtXoZgrLSgLEZT8jQpcTWfzbcC42lUsNIIdlHVnmfaOqfXwcMrGi+wWbwEgGJlEMGtzrbca9XJs5OdUa7FtC/xNWFb/4s3WgM9mmSN0j/gx0vdW/nCsvRFPAqmTeSlf/Hdi4Ao= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=LtRJsetv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="LtRJsetv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1752522388; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=e77DmMCoRU1Wn+QB8qyXAVxRpVcBX5B1RuM9TG938xk=; b=LtRJsetvRIaXnxhNgSA7qbBpO38KBP3aGI5ZdIWH80j51vM7fzJ/jX5o6xL1hO5esDDhjD KAbvVGmAJAtNr/K9WbtFwmnCyPMPB8+vkX/YCIRnUfZGIZjxD94a77Tin9nZRSKpRQGPdF gCxxia1UcbUjOMkQ+3wLYcNzxQjMeBs= Received: from mail-qv1-f72.google.com (mail-qv1-f72.google.com [209.85.219.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-536-qR2bsB0gOzS6qR-rMJ2rxA-1; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:46:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qR2bsB0gOzS6qR-rMJ2rxA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: qR2bsB0gOzS6qR-rMJ2rxA_1752522387 Received: by mail-qv1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6fab979413fso84444836d6.2 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752522387; x=1753127187; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e77DmMCoRU1Wn+QB8qyXAVxRpVcBX5B1RuM9TG938xk=; b=F35cJB590MbZy0rBHbyh6Oj/4s0hoaL/Jga8RbAnp8Gk8b1VaJPdix/Iyce9wIh7lY g8LUEI0AxuCBhuXM5eRgp9e3MzHOTKbdMinAJAEThShHK7i2YHF9fUSNVIvbwmX5YnVi 1jZe2otqWTzykab63027kk3K9egdOx3LYAJbfY7gRC0CYbFjTuAFf9X22aDbfOwOavH+ OserDJv8jwjC9mSet9mDHPXo+VEeJVgSMu9KMdK5lqM2Ul285E4vVJSwCHYkOU3gpVtf ywOn29rjikMQtPX7DW/VU12jQs3dzL7TyyMs7YpuW3vtZl7FUa/+2yMNyQ/rmriPxQ8k Rzsg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzUWZkqqVgk3KHamTZwv2R4Tj+X/RbvYUUmx0QhyQES3urXuUDr lCzgahNxR9XXWNI9N/P0dhgbfJLQPglZagKlgsQgA8fUK8MD4irBBgNUsmttvrgXhOERga2klrk UH6rtpvNXK9AWJjZpvS5M81xhtG/pBCKo7ZHhyMUyzLqu8CP2dtYQ5AoSD/A= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuBYY0IAsYstzkUuxyBRbFHv6kofBZF3wI8uyioY0mJu/8U2xW8fWU2VUg8R8c WcgYBbxkAw83dguDRq/ihe6KNd/gTMj2vulG7iQFIwdFQl4De1vn5jhMEvUojez6QXXGII7IN1l AafRDIZA1MKYPUu6FIC91M+J8B4D1ZyHLFY+AU5P1UID12Tw9fQ3ymfSZGBvHSebusMXHaFRZ/m U3LwbU5TdOmcAU2XL3JcDAmiHlYH8ext5Hr25OGISgTGaragsa+7//d65iYGi6HuQzzpl+igpoe f1BsnUsVsQIRyn8WnlMFK3z7b8GVRX2NkSZ8L5hlUpZC9dxSugHptFfCWC9jbSYPkR9ikIuNvj+ ylget4DyJJw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:cc2:b0:704:7dfc:f56e with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-704a3613b4dmr244553006d6.18.1752522386896; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IElhu76RklpmkE20l9U4kG/pwoEeaDE5mQBdKQN+0kBAtrFc9uJ9PSyHoUopb1ufV0fL2J4VQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:cc2:b0:704:7dfc:f56e with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-704a3613b4dmr244552446d6.18.1752522386276; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:188:c180:4250:ecbe:130d:668d:951d? ([2601:188:c180:4250:ecbe:130d:668d:951d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-70497d71424sm50382696d6.85.2025.07.14.12.46.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Waiman Long X-Google-Original-From: Waiman Long Message-ID: <0dac8a78-79d1-41d0-bc82-0c8af8db9104@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:46:23 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cgroups@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH next] cpuset: fix warning when attaching tasks with offline CPUs To: Chen Ridong , tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com, peterz@infradead.org Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huawei.com References: <20250714032311.3570157-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20250714032311.3570157-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 7/13/25 11:23 PM, Chen Ridong wrote: > From: Chen Ridong > > A kernel warning was observed in the cpuset migration path: > > WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 123 at kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:3130 > cgroup_migrate_execute+0x8df/0xf30 > Call Trace: > cgroup_transfer_tasks+0x2f3/0x3b0 > cpuset_migrate_tasks_workfn+0x146/0x3b0 > process_one_work+0x5ba/0xda0 > worker_thread+0x788/0x1220 > > The issue can be reliably reproduced with: > > # Setup test cpuset > mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/test > echo 2-3 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/test/cpuset.cpus > echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/test/cpuset.mems > > # Start test process > sleep 100 & > pid=$! > echo $pid > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/test/cgroup.procs > taskset -p 0xC $pid # Bind to CPUs 2-3 > > # Take CPUs offline > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/online > > Root cause analysis: > When tasks are migrated to top_cpuset due to CPUs going offline, > cpuset_attach_task() sets the CPU affinity using cpus_attach which > is initialized from cpu_possible_mask. This mask may include offline > CPUs. When __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() computes the intersection between: > 1. cpus_attach (possible CPUs, may include offline) > 2. p->user_cpus_ptr (original user-set mask) > The resulting new_mask may contain only offline CPUs, causing the > operation to fail. > > The fix changes cpus_attach initialization to use cpu_active_mask > instead of cpu_possible_mask, ensuring we only consider online CPUs > when setting the new affinity. This prevents the scenario where > the intersection would result in an invalid CPU set. > > Fixes: da019032819a ("sched: Enforce user requested affinity") > Reported-by: Yang Lijin > Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong > --- > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > index f74d04429a29..5401adbdffa6 100644 > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > @@ -3121,7 +3121,7 @@ static void cpuset_attach_task(struct cpuset *cs, struct task_struct *task) > if (cs != &top_cpuset) > guarantee_active_cpus(task, cpus_attach); > else > - cpumask_andnot(cpus_attach, task_cpu_possible_mask(task), > + cpumask_andnot(cpus_attach, cpu_active_mask, > subpartitions_cpus); > /* > * can_attach beforehand should guarantee that this doesn't Offline CPUs are explicitly included for tasks in top_cpuset. Can you try the following patch to see if it works? Thanks, Longman diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c index 3bc4301466f3..acd70120228c 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c @@ -3114,6 +3114,10 @@ static void cpuset_cancel_attach(struct cgroup_taskset *tset)  static cpumask_var_t cpus_attach;  static nodemask_t cpuset_attach_nodemask_to; +/* + * Note that tasks in the top cpuset won't get update to their cpumasks when + * a hotplug event happens. So we include offline CPUs as well. + */  static void cpuset_attach_task(struct cpuset *cs, struct task_struct *task)  {         lockdep_assert_held(&cpuset_mutex); @@ -3127,7 +3131,16 @@ static void cpuset_attach_task(struct cpuset *cs, struct task_struct *task)          * can_attach beforehand should guarantee that this doesn't          * fail.  TODO: have a better way to handle failure here          */ -       WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, cpus_attach)); +       if (unlikely(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, cpus_attach))) { +               /* +                * Since offline CPUs are included for top_cpuset, +                * set_cpus_allowed_ptr() can fail if user_cpus_ptr contains +                * only offline CPUs. Take out the offline CPUs and retry. +                */ +               if (cs == &top_cpuset) +                       cpumask_and(cpus_attach, cpus_attach, cpu_active_mask); +               WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(task, cpus_attach)); +       }         cpuset_change_task_nodemask(task, &cpuset_attach_nodemask_to);         cpuset1_update_task_spread_flags(cs, task);