From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
hpa@zytor.com
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:59:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fd64322-9c90-8e9c-d65a-e8216b0da1a5@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a549986-f01a-a3c6-10c8-c116667bf7e4@linux.intel.com>
On 2018/12/12 8:14, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 12/11/2018 3:46 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2018/12/12 1:18, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> On 12/10/18 4:24 PM, Aubrey Li wrote:
>>>> The tracking turns on the usage flag at the next context switch of
>>>> the task, but requires 3 consecutive context switches with no usage
>>>> to clear it. This decay is required because well-written AVX-512
>>>> applications are expected to clear this state when not actively using
>>>> AVX-512 registers.
>>>
>>> One concern about this: Given a HZ=1000 system, this means that the
>>> flag needs to get scanned every ~3ms. That's a pretty good amount of
>>> scanning on a system with hundreds or thousands of tasks running around.
>>>
>>> How many tasks does this scale to until you're eating up an entire CPU
>>> or two just scanning /proc?
>>>
>>
>> Do we have a real requirement to do this in practical environment?
>> AFAIK, 1s or even 5s is good enough in some customers environment.
>
> maybe instead of a 1/0 bit, it's useful to store the timestamp of the last
> time we found the task to use avx? (need to find a good time unit)
>
>
Are you suggesting kernel does not do any translation, just provide a fact
to the user space tool and let user space tool to decide how to use this info?
So how does user space tool use this timestamp in your mind?
Thanks,
-Aubrey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-11 0:24 [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks Aubrey Li
2018-12-11 0:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] proc: add AVX-512 usage to /proc/pid/status Aubrey Li
2018-12-11 17:57 ` Tim Chen
2018-12-11 17:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks Dave Hansen
2018-12-11 17:52 ` Tim Chen
2018-12-11 17:53 ` Andi Kleen
2018-12-11 23:46 ` Li, Aubrey
2018-12-12 0:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2018-12-12 0:59 ` Li, Aubrey [this message]
2018-12-12 1:06 ` Dave Hansen
2018-12-11 17:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-12-12 0:34 ` Li, Aubrey
2018-12-12 0:39 ` Dave Hansen
2018-12-12 16:55 ` David Laight
2018-12-12 18:00 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fd64322-9c90-8e9c-d65a-e8216b0da1a5@linux.intel.com \
--to=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.