From: Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: The Linux binutils vs. the FSF binutils on Linux/mips
Date: 14 Sep 2001 12:40:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1000496403.29163.0.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010914123642.A18552@lucon.org>
> It seems that those small differences between 2 assemblers make a big
> difference for the Linux/mips kernel. Does anyone know why?
Dunno, what's the change.
-eric
--
Look out behind you!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-14 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-14 19:36 The Linux binutils vs. the FSF binutils on Linux/mips H . J . Lu
2001-09-14 19:40 ` Eric Christopher [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1000496403.29163.0.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com \
--to=echristo@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.