All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Pang <ozone@algorithm.com.au>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, safemode@speakeasy.net,
	Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de, iafilius@xs4all.nl,
	ilsensine@inwind.it, george@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:57:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1001131036.557760.4340.nullmailer@bozar.algorithm.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1000939458.3853.17.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: <1000939458.3853.17.camel@phantasy>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:44:09PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:

> Available at:
> http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.9-ac12-preempt-stats-1 and
> http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.10-pre12-preempt-stats-1
> for 2.4.9-ac12 and 2.4.10-pre12, respectively.

hi Robert, thanks for producing the stats patches!

i did a test of it on linux-2.4.10-pre13 with Benno Senoner's
lowlatency program, which i hacked up a bit to output
/proc/latencytimes after each of the graphs.  test results are at

    http://www.algorithm.com.au/hacking/linux-lowlatency/2.4.10-pre13-pes/

and since i stared at the results in disbelief, i won't even try
to guess what's going on :).  maybe you can make some sense of
it?

i'm prety sure his latencytest program runs at real-time
priority, but i'll run another test just with the getrt and rt
programs just posted to the list to make sure.  that's the only
reason i can think why the graph is so bizarre compared to the
/proc/latencytimes results.


-- 
#ozone/algorithm <ozone@algorithm.com.au>          - trust.in.love.to.save

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-22  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-19 22:44 [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Robert Love
2001-09-20  1:40 ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-20  2:23   ` safemode
2001-09-20  1:13     ` David Lang
2001-09-20  2:57       ` Robert Love
2001-09-20  2:38     ` Robert Love
2001-09-20  6:31 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-20 20:27   ` Robert Love
     [not found]     ` <200109202111.f8KLBgG16833@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-20 22:09       ` [PATCH] Preemption patch 2.4.9-ac12 Robert Love
2001-09-20  6:31 ` [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Dieter Nützel
     [not found] ` <20010920063143.424BD1E41A@Cantor.suse.de>
2001-09-20  6:41   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20  7:57     ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]     ` <20010920075751.6CA791E6B2@Cantor.suse.de>
2001-09-20  8:21       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-20 20:13         ` george anzinger
2001-09-20 20:38           ` Randy.Dunlap
2001-09-20 21:10         ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 21:35           ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-20 22:03             ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-09-20 22:51               ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]               ` <200109202252.f8KMqLG17327@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-21  3:17                 ` Robert Love
2001-09-21 15:48                   ` george anzinger
2001-09-22 21:09                     ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-22 23:40                       ` safemode
2001-09-22 23:46                       ` Dieter Nützel
2001-09-23  0:15                       ` safemode
     [not found]                       ` <200109222340.BAA37547@blipp.internet5.net>
2001-09-23  0:38                         ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-23  1:42                           ` safemode
2001-09-23  3:02                           ` Robert Love
2001-09-23 16:43                             ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-23  0:42                       ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]                       ` <200109222341.f8MNfnG25152@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-23  2:50                         ` Robert Love
2001-09-23  3:14                           ` george anzinger
2001-09-23  4:06                             ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]                       ` <200109222347.f8MNlMG25157@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-23  2:54                         ` Robert Love
2001-09-27  0:02                           ` [reiserfs-list] " Dieter Nützel
     [not found]                       ` <200109230016.f8N0G6G25222@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-23  2:58                         ` Robert Love
     [not found]                     ` <200109222120.f8MLKYG24859@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-23  2:44                       ` Robert Love
     [not found]     ` <200109200757.JAA60995@blipp.internet5.net>
2001-09-20 17:37       ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-20 21:29         ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 21:53           ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]     ` <200109200758.f8K7wEG13675@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-20 21:09       ` Robert Love
2001-09-20 20:01 ` Tobias Diedrich
2001-09-20 22:01   ` Robert Love
2001-09-22  3:57 ` Andre Pang [this message]
2001-09-22  6:10   ` Robert Love
2001-09-22  7:22     ` Andre Pang
2001-09-23  3:18       ` george anzinger
2001-09-23  3:21         ` Robert Love
2001-09-23  7:05       ` Robert Love
2001-09-23 12:03         ` Andre Pang
2001-09-23 18:31           ` Robert Love
2001-09-22 12:56     ` ksoftirqd? (Was: Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool) Roger Larsson
2001-09-22 13:14       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-22 20:51         ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-22 21:33           ` Andrea Arcangeli
     [not found] <200109202253.RAA21082@waste.org>
2001-09-20 23:15 ` [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool Oliver Xymoron
2001-09-21  0:42   ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21  1:03     ` Alan Cox
2001-09-21  1:22       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-21  1:51         ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-21  1:38       ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21  1:53         ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21  2:08           ` Roger Larsson
2001-09-21  2:29             ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-21 16:24       ` Jussi Laako
2001-09-21 16:36         ` Alan Cox
2001-09-21 18:46         ` Thomas Sailer
2001-09-22 10:30           ` Jussi Laako
2001-09-21 16:18     ` Stefan Westerfeld
2001-09-21 20:18       ` Dieter Nützel
     [not found]       ` <200109212018.f8LKImG21229@zero.tech9.net>
2001-09-21 21:47         ` Robert Love
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-09  5:23 [PATCH] preemption latency measurement tool Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1001131036.557760.4340.nullmailer@bozar.algorithm.com.au \
    --to=ozone@algorithm.com.au \
    --cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=iafilius@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=ilsensine@inwind.it \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=safemode@speakeasy.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.