From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from webmail.tiscalinet.be (webmail2.tiscali.be [212.35.2.201]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80851482C for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 03:09:04 -0600 (MDT) To: Matthew Wilcox Message-ID: <1002618541.3bc2bead27af0@webmail.tiscalinet.be> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 11:09:01 +0200 (CEST) From: joel.soete@freebel.net Cc: joel.soete@freebel.net, Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org References: <1002553729.3bc1c18187924@webmail.tiscalinet.be> <20011008162234.D28880@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <1002556397.3bc1cbed99e0b@webmail.tiscalinet.be> <20011008173620.I3745@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20011008173620.I3745@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: LVM 1.0.1-rc4 on hppa List-ID: Quoting Matthew Wilcox : > On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 06:39:17PM +0200, hgrothe@mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de wrote: > > I guess :-) that you compiled the lvm-tools with optimization. Since > > there seems to be a general problem with the lvm-tools and gcc3 (appears > > also on other architectures (see lvm mailing list)) recompile the > > lvm-tools without optimisation or "weak" optimisation (-O0). The all LVM-HOWTO test seems to works fine if change -O2 to -O0 into make.tmpl. > -O0 is no optimisation, -O1 is weak optimisation and -O2 is most > optimisations. This is normally a bug in the code, not the compiler... I thinks so too. I will try now to recompile with -O2 and -ggdb to try to have a better idea. Thanks again for help, joel ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through Tiscalinet Webmail (http://webmail.tiscali.be)