From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
Cc: David Lang <dlang@diginsite.com>,
Timur Tabi <ttabi@interactivesi.com>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone?
Date: 09 Oct 2001 18:43:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002667385.1673.129.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110091528450.18826-100000@anime.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0110091528450.18826-100000@anime.net>
On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 18:30, Dan Hollis wrote:
> It's palomino core. It means, new SSE instructions, bigger TLB cache,
> prefetch, and 20% power reduction. All this for maybe 5%-15% performance
> increase. And a not so nice increase in price tag :-o
Oh, you are right.
I meant MP vs XP part, sorry. From what I gather, MP is no different
from XP, although perhaps "certified for SMP" -- despite costing more
per MHz.
> Dual 1.2 non-MP is fine for me thanks... plenty fast and cheap.
Completely Agreed. I am thinking of getting a dual AMD system for doing
more kernel work (tackle AMD and SMP). My main machine is a P3 now.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-09 21:16 Dual Athlon XP 1800+ on Tyan Thunder K7 or Tiger MP anyone? Dieter Nützel
2001-10-09 21:52 ` Timur Tabi
2001-10-09 22:06 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-16 1:46 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-10-16 2:22 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:12 ` Robert Love
2001-10-09 20:58 ` David Lang
2001-10-09 22:30 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:43 ` Robert Love [this message]
2001-10-11 19:14 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-11 19:22 ` nick
2001-10-15 21:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-15 21:58 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-11 19:24 ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2001-10-15 21:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-15 21:57 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-15 22:07 ` Timur Tabi
2001-10-16 18:40 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2001-10-15 22:08 ` John Jasen
2001-10-15 22:20 ` Wilson
2001-10-16 12:23 ` Bill Davidsen
2001-10-11 21:19 ` John J Tobin
2001-10-12 19:32 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-10-12 19:46 ` Jeff Nguyen
2001-10-12 20:32 ` Jelle Foks
2001-10-09 22:17 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-10-09 22:24 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 21:09 ` David Lang
2001-10-09 22:32 ` Dan Hollis
2001-10-09 22:27 ` German Gomez Garcia
2001-10-09 22:54 ` Robert Love
2001-10-10 14:45 ` Charles Cazabon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-09 22:41 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-09 23:14 Dieter Nützel
2001-10-17 19:38 Thomas Esser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1002667385.1673.129.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=dlang@diginsite.com \
--cc=goemon@anime.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttabi@interactivesi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.