All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Benoît Thébaudeau" <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mxc nand: Add support for i.MX5
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:24:24 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1006715218.53219.1357640664105.JavaMail.root@advansee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357637609-18663-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>

Dear Marek Vasut,

On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 10:33:29 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mxc nand: Add support for i.MX5

Where is the 2/2?

> 
> From: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beno?t Th?baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>
> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h |    9 ++
>  drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c              |  219
>  ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  include/fsl_nfc.h                        |  149 +++++++++++++-------
>  nand_spl/nand_boot_fsl_nfc.c             |  114 ++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 364 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
> 
> NOTE: I'm seeing issues when this is compiled into U-Boot. U-Boot
> won't boot on
> my MX53 board and will hang right after printing "DRAM:" and before
> printing the
> CPU info. I suspect it's some kind of unaligned access.

OK. I'm waiting for your test results. It works for me on i.MX51 with 2012.07.

> 
> NOTE2: I fixed a few complaints from GCC

Which ones? I don't see any such change in this new version.

> and rebased on top of
> master.

OK.

[--snip--]
> @@ -698,7 +757,7 @@ static int mxc_nand_correct_data(struct mtd_info
> *mtd, u_char *dat,
>  	 * additional correction.  2-Bit errors cannot be corrected by
>  	 * HW ECC, so we need to return failure
>  	 */
> -	uint16_t ecc_status = readw(&host->regs->ecc_status_result);
> +	uint32_t ecc_status = readnfc(&host->regs->ecc_status_result);
        ^
Here it was uint16_t in my last version, and this was correct since this is code
for MXC_NFC_V1. This change should not hurt, but it was not necessary.

Is this change related to the GCC complaints that you mentioned?

>  
>  	if (((ecc_status & 0x3) == 2) || ((ecc_status >> 2) == 2)) {
>  		MTDDEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL0,
[--snip--]

The other changes (i.e. the rebase) are fine with me.

Best regards,
Beno?t

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-08 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-08  9:33 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mxc nand: Add support for i.MX5 Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 10:23 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-01-08 10:40   ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 10:24 ` Benoît Thébaudeau [this message]
2013-01-08 10:38   ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 10:54     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-01-08 11:05       ` Marek Vasut
2013-01-08 11:18         ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-02 13:43           ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2013-02-02 15:04             ` Marek Vasut
2013-02-04 19:55               ` Scott Wood
2013-01-08 18:34       ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1006715218.53219.1357640664105.JavaMail.root@advansee.com \
    --to=benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.