From: Ben <kf4wbx@hamsnet.net>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Help! VG corrupted?
Date: Mon Nov 26 21:10:02 2001 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1006830613.2791.27.camel@outback.key> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011120113607.A18529@sistina.com>
Sorry for the accidental repost :(
I will try to get a newer version of LVM installed this week and give
you the response from vgck.
BTW, is it safe for me to just use the 1.0.1rc4 utils and kernel on a VG
created with the 0.9 release?
Until then,
thanks for your advice.
-BAK
On Tue, 2001-11-20 at 05:36, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
>
> Ben,
>
> what does vgck(8) tell you about the health of your LVM on disk metadata?
> BTW: it is recommended that you upgrade to LVM 1.0.1
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 02:12:31PM -0500, Ben wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am running Mandrake 8.1 which installs Linux LVM 0.9. I've read posts
> > that mention that 0.9 is "bad for your health." While I'm not totally
> > sure why or how, it seems to be the case for me as well.
> >
> > I installed the OS and ran find with one IDE HD partition dedicated
> > (/dev/hda9, one VG on one PV) to LVM and two LV's (/usr and /var).
> > Yesterday, I added another partition (/dev/hda7) and added its PEs to
> > the VG. I thhen added the newly added PE's to the /usr LV. Everything
> > was great. Then I rebooted. Upon reboot, I got:
> > [root@cray]# vgscan -v
> > vgscan -- removing "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d"
> > vgscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...)
> > vgscan -- scanning for all active volume group(s) first
> > vgscan -- found inactive volume group "vg0"
> > vgscan -- reading data of volume group "vg0" from physical volume(s)
> > vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV" can't get
> > data of volume group "vg0" from physical volume(s)
> > vgscan -- ERROR "vg_read_with_pv_and_lv(): allocated LE of LV" creating
> > "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d"
> > [root@cray]#
> >
> > I then tried the vgcfgrestore, which ran sucessfully. Now I get vgscan
> > reporting no volumes. Found a reference on how to fix this (using dd
> > and reading uuids from pv's, then writing them back to the disk). That
> > procedure brings me back to the starting point.
> >
> > It seems the data is there because pvscan reports:
> >
> > [root@cray]# pvscan
> > pvscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...)
> > pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide0/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7" is
> > associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan)
> > pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide0/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part9" is
> > associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan)
> > pvscan -- total 2 [12.02 GB] / in use: 2 [12.02 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0]
> > [root@cray]#
> >
> > One more note of interest: My partitions on disk are out of order.
> > hda7 occupies cylinders 2848-3736 and hda9 occupies cylinders 2168-2847.
> >
> > [root@cray]# fdisk /dev/hda
> > Command (m for help): p
> >
> > Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 3763 cylinders
> > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
> >
> > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > /dev/hda1 * 1 934 7502323+ b Win95 FAT32
> > /dev/hda2 935 3736 22507065 5 Extended
> > /dev/hda5 * 935 1874 7550518+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> > /dev/hda6 1875 2135 2096451 83 Linux
> > /dev/hda7 2848 3736 7140861 8e Linux LVM
> > /dev/hda8 2136 2167 256977 82 Linux swap
> > /dev/hda9 2168 2847 5462037 8e Linux LVM
> >
> > Partition table entries are not in disk order
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So, can anyone help me? Would recreating the VG and adding the PV's to
> > it restore access to my data? Or would I just blow it all away in the
> > attempt?
> >
> > Please send responses directly to kf4wbx@hamsnet.net
> >
> >
> > Thanks for any help!
> > -Ben K
> > kf4wbx@hamsnet.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-lvm mailing list
> > linux-lvm@sistina.com
> > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
>
> Regards,
> Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
>
> *** Software bugs are stupid.
> Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
> Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
> 56242 Marienrachdorf
> Germany
> Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
> FAX 924446
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-26 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-19 13:12 [linux-lvm] Help! VG corrupted? Ben
2001-11-20 4:41 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-11-26 21:10 ` Ben [this message]
2001-11-27 0:15 ` Andreas Dilger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-26 21:04 [linux-lvm] Help!! VG Corrupted? Ben
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1006830613.2791.27.camel@outback.key \
--to=kf4wbx@hamsnet.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.