From: Jason Baietto <jason@baietto.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Multiprocessor Control Interfaces
Date: 10 Dec 2001 20:59:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1008035965.11626.3.camel@tofu> (raw)
Some people have asked me for more information before they'll attempt
to download and play with this stuff, so here's the --help output from
the latest version of the run(1) command:
Usage: run [OPTIONS] { COMMAND [ARGS] | PROCESS_SPECIFIER }
Set scheduling parameters and CPU bias for a new process or a list
of existing processes.
OPTIONS can be one or more of the following options:
-b, --bias=LIST Set the CPU bias to the LIST of CPUs;
CPUs are numbered starting from 0
-s, --policy=POLICY Set the scheduling policy to POLICY
-P, --priority=LEVEL Set the scheduling priority to LEVEL
-q, --quantum=QUANTUM Set the SCHED_RR quantum to QUANTUM
-v, --version Output version information and exit
-h, --help Display this help and exit
PROCESS_SPECIFIER is exactly one of the following options:
-p, --pid=LIST Specify LIST of existing PIDs to modify
-g, --group=LIST Specify LIST of process groups to modify; all
existing processes in the groups will be modified
-u, --user=LIST Specify LIST of users to modify; all existing
processes owned by the users will be modified
-n, --name=LIST Specify LIST of existing process names to modify
Multiple comma separated values can be specified for all LISTs and ranges
are allowed where appropriate (e.g. "run -b 0,1-3 autopilot").
See the run(1) man page for more information.
Take care,
Jason
> Hello All,
>
> I'm currently working on adding multiprocessor control interfaces
> to Linux. My current efforts can be found here:
>
> http://www.ccur.com/realtime/oss
>
> These are clean-room implementations of similar tools that have
> been available in our proprietary *nix for quite some time, and
> so the interfaces have a fair amount of mileage under their belts.
> Note that the scope is somewhat wider than just MP.
>
> There has been some discussion of "chaff" and other interfaces
> recently on this list, so in an effort to hopefully move towards
> a standard more quickly I've gotten permission from my employer
> to GPL the code I've written. I'm very interested in comments
> and feedback on any or all of this work.
>
> Here's the README file from the package:
>
>
> This package contains:
>
> run(1)
> A multiprocessor control command line tool.
>
> mpadvise(3)
> A multiprocessor control library interface.
>
> These services rely upon Robert Love's CPU Affinity patch
> (version 2.4.16-1 was used for testing) which is available here:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/cpu-affinity/v2.4/
>
> To build the code, simply unpack it and type "make". The code has
> been tested on Red Hat 7.1 and 7.2 systems, though it is still
> fairly new and almost certainly contains bugs.
>
> An attempt was made to abstract the "cpuset" representation of
> the current system in order to have binaries that in theory
> could work on systems with more than 32 cpus. For this to work,
> the run(1) command would need to be linked against a shared
> mpadvise(3) library (currently only a static library is made).
>
> This code is being released in the hopes that it will become
> the basis for the Linux multiprocessor control standard interfaces.
> I am very interested in getting feedback on this package,
> so please contact me via email or LKML if you have any.
>
> This source code is licensed under the GNU GPL Version 2.
> Copyright (C) 2001 Concurrent Computer Corporation
>
> --
> Jason Baietto
> jason.baietto@ccur.com
> http://www.ccur.com/realtime/oss
next reply other threads:[~2001-12-11 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-11 1:59 Jason Baietto [this message]
2001-12-11 1:38 ` [RFC] Multiprocessor Control Interfaces Tim Hockin
2001-12-11 16:31 ` Jason Baietto
2001-12-11 18:16 ` Tim Hockin
2001-12-12 15:11 ` Jason Baietto
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-10 20:14 Jason Baietto
2001-12-11 6:29 ` Robert Love
2001-12-11 16:18 ` Jason Baietto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1008035965.11626.3.camel@tofu \
--to=jason@baietto.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.