From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Lego Lin <lego.lin@gmail.com>
Cc: lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Using rculist for dirty tracking
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 12:36:27 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1009482720.2512.1596818187667.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALR1Az+iE_0smhqj2saNsc0+KFPVSrH+ki59gKc4NjVvYdVkQA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1843 bytes --]
----- On Aug 7, 2020, at 3:24 AM, lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am new for using rcu and I need some helps for integrating user space rcu into
> my project for solving performance issue.
> In my project, I create 2 link list - one for free pool, one for using pool.
> Free pool used to hold a segment of memory that no-one use.
> Using pool used to hold a segment of memory that someone use.
> Originally, I use a pthread_spin_lock to protect
> 1. alloc memory segment from free pool, and move memory segment from free pool
> to using pool
> 2. free memory segment from using pool, and move memory segment from free pool
> to using pool
I suspect we would need to know the entire intended design here in order to start
a discussion. What operations are doing list traversals ? What operations are doing
updates ? How frequently are each respective operation done ? Do you intend to
keep your spin lock to protect concurrent list updates, and if not how do you plan on
protecting concurrent updates ?
What are the performance issues you are experiencing exactly ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
> For RCU, I change the list_move_tail as following
> cds_list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, next, &(membk_pool->bk_free_pool), entry_pool)
> {
> cds_list_del_rcu(&cur->entry_pool);
> urcu_bp_synchronize_rcu();
> cds_list_add_tail_rcu(&ret->entry_pool, &(membk_pool->bk_using_pool));
> }
> Is it ok to use scenario like this?
> Meanwhile, that are some advance list operation API:
> 1. list_first_entry
> 2. list_first_entry_or_null
> Is it possible to integrate these into current urcu?
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3291 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-07 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-07 7:24 [lttng-dev] Using rculist for dirty tracking Lego Lin via lttng-dev
2020-08-07 16:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1009482720.2512.1596818187667.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=lego.lin@gmail.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.