From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: timothy.covell@ashavan.org
Cc: "François Cami" <stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr>,
mingo@elte.hu, "Mike Kravetz" <kravetz@us.ibm.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Anton Blanchard" <anton@samba.org>,
"george anzinger" <george@mvista.com>,
"Davide Libenzi" <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -G1, 2.5.2-pre10, 2.4.17 (fwd)
Date: 12 Jan 2002 15:00:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1010865650.2152.38.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200201121630.g0CGU5Sr006966@svr3.applink.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201110142160.12174-100000@localhost.localdomain> <200201112150.g0BLoESr004177@svr3.applink.net> <1010814327.2018.5.camel@phantasy> <200201121630.g0CGU5Sr006966@svr3.applink.net>
On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 11:26, Timothy Covell wrote:
> That's the million dollar question. I was just concerned that if that
> were to be implemented in a production kernel, then lots of admins
> would be confused.
It is in 2.5. Let's agree if it is or is not a problem, and then find a
solution.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-12 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-10 14:19 [patch] O(1) scheduler, -G1, 2.5.2-pre10, 2.4.17 (fwd) Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-10 20:11 ` george anzinger
2002-01-10 23:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 23:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-11 0:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 20:01 ` Robert Love
2002-01-10 23:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 21:57 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-01-11 0:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-01-10 23:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-01-11 21:42 ` François Cami
2002-01-11 21:46 ` Timothy Covell
[not found] ` <1010814327.2018.5.camel@phantasy>
2002-01-12 11:48 ` François Cami
2002-01-12 16:26 ` Timothy Covell
2002-01-12 20:00 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-01-12 20:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-01-12 20:44 ` Timothy Covell
2002-01-12 23:56 ` Robert Love
2002-01-13 6:59 ` Rusty Russell
2002-01-14 8:40 ` Marian Jancar
2002-01-11 21:53 ` Mark Hahn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-13 20:30 Dieter Nützel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1010865650.2152.38.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=timothy.covell@ashavan.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.