From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Paralell IO performance with LVM and XFS From: Austin Gonyou In-Reply-To: <20020117175832.GL1066@tykepenguin.com> References: <20020117175832.GL1066@tykepenguin.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QPEr5ApZ5+DROd+33FVc" Message-Id: <1011294681.26798.0.camel@UberGeek> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Jan 17 13:12:02 2002 List-Id: To: linux-lvm@sistina.com --=-QPEr5ApZ5+DROd+33FVc Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What card were you using?=20 On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 11:58, Patrick Caulfield wrote: > > Why are you so certain that it's the FC interface at fault? The FC > interface=20 > > should be able to do more than 60MB/s. >=20 > I don't suppose I am that certain to be honest but I had so much trouble > with > the Linux drivers for this card that at the time I was prepared to blame > everything from Global Warming downwards on it.=20 >=20 > patrick >=20 --=20 Austin Gonyou Systems Architect, CCNA Coremetrics, Inc. Phone: 512-698-7250 email: austin@coremetrics.com "It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it." Latin Proverb --=-QPEr5ApZ5+DROd+33FVc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8RyHZ94g6ZVmFMoIRArSrAJ9UfdK5QCBbmcxpv7ybkRk4g/sbXQCfQzmO xc7hOqvfW6PqZchCBIxl/5k= =GvbU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QPEr5ApZ5+DROd+33FVc--