From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:00:59 -0400
Subject: Per container uptime?
In-Reply-To: <20170413143416.GB5209@sith>
References: <20170413143416.GB5209@sith>
Message-ID: <10133.1492099259@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:34:17 +0200, Fran?ois said:
> Do you think it makes sense at all?

The bigger question is whether there's stuff that runs in a container that
wants the system uptime, which would break under this API change.

> Any hint on how to get started on that?

It's trivial - note the uptime at container creation, stash the value
in the container struct, and subtract when an uptime request happens.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 484 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/attachments/20170413/7f4ed2c1/attachment.bin