From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: Robert Jameson <rj@open-net.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hard lockup with 2.4.18-pre9 + preempt + lock break + O1k[23] + rmap
Date: 15 Feb 2002 17:00:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1013810411.803.1045.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020215201810.GA5310@matchmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020215035135.0c26b130.rj@open-net.org> <1013780277.950.663.camel@phantasy> <20020215201810.GA5310@matchmail.com>
On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 15:18, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I don't use USB, and I have had several machines lock up hard while doing
> medium to heavy IO. I've had this happen with pre9-mjc2 and another patch
> that just contained pre9-preempt-schedo1
> (nyu.dyn.dhs.org:8080/patches/2.4.18-pre9-to-rmap12e-schedO1-rml.patch.bz2)
The -mjc and similar patches make debugging a bit, uh, hard ;)
> I'm running 2.4.18-pre9-ac3 now to see if I can reproduce without prempt and
> O(1).
If you can't reproduce it, I'd like to see if you can reproduce it
_only_ with preempt. Also, if it happens on stock pre9 (no -ac) would
be of interest, since that doesn't have Andre's IDE patch.
> I have someone else from IRC that has the same issue with prempt+O(1)
> against vanilla 2.4.17. He should be sending you a bug report soon.
Now this would be of interest, thanks.
> BTW, all machines ran the same kernel compiled for SMP, but some machines
> were UP.
>
> Has anyone else seen this?
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-15 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-15 8:51 oops with 2.4.18-pre9-mjc2 Robert Jameson
2002-02-15 8:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-02-15 13:29 ` Michael Cohen
2002-02-15 13:37 ` Robert Love
2002-02-15 15:20 ` Robert Jameson
2002-02-15 15:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-15 17:48 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-15 19:15 ` Robert Love
2002-02-15 20:18 ` Hard lockup with 2.4.18-pre9 + preempt + lock break + O1k[23] + rmap Mike Fedyk
2002-02-15 22:00 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-02-15 23:22 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-15 23:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-02-15 23:42 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-16 9:29 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-02-15 14:26 ` oops with 2.4.18-pre9-mjc2 Alan Cox
2002-02-15 16:07 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1013810411.803.1045.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=rj@open-net.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.