From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:00:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:00:02 -0500 Received: from zero.tech9.net ([209.61.188.187]:54534 "EHLO zero.tech9.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:59:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5: proc interface for setting task affinity From: Robert Love To: peter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1014853926.21516.20.camel@twins.localnet> In-Reply-To: <1014852882.1109.218.camel@phantasy> <1014853926.21516.20.camel@twins.localnet> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 27 Feb 2002 18:59:37 -0500 Message-Id: <1014854378.1109.238.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 18:52, peter wrote: > This is great news,. could you please backport this to 2.4.x + O(1). > That would mean that I can finaly use the new scheduler. > I need to run X on a single CPU because the MGA-G400 driver has some > SMP difficulties. See if this patch applies on 2.4, it probably does. If not I'll look into the rejects when I get a chance ... Note also that much of the thanks for these interfaces should go to Ingo, since he got set_cpus_allowed working with p != current. btw: I have an MGA-G550 (uses the same mga driver as you) and have no problems with X on an SMP machine ... Robert Love