From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Rakesh Kumar Banka <Rakesh@asu.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Monolithic Vs. Microkernel
Date: 05 Mar 2002 22:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1015363031.9958.3.camel@bip> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203051803120.1413-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203051803120.1413-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
le mar 05-03-2002 à 22:04, Rik van Riel a écrit :
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > This means we can have all the advantages of modularity at the
> >
> > Not *all* of them. On vsta, you could do
> >
> > ( killall keyboard; sleep 1; keyboard ) &
>
> How is that different from the following ?
>
> (rmmod keyboard ; sleep 1 ; modprobe keyboard)
>
> [no, no need to talk about hardware access ... vsta's keyboard
> driver also has hardware access]
killall works when keyboard is deadlocked, I suppose.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-05 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-26 6:11 Monolithic Vs. Microkernel Rakesh Kumar Banka
2002-02-26 6:17 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-26 9:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 6:17 ` David Lang
2002-02-26 6:23 ` Eric Krout
2002-02-26 11:45 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-04 14:49 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-05 20:34 ` Alexander Viro
2002-03-05 20:47 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-05 21:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-05 21:17 ` Xavier Bestel [this message]
2002-03-06 11:22 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-05 21:32 ` Bernd Eckenfels
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-26 10:34 Hans Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1015363031.9958.3.camel@bip \
--to=xavier.bestel@free.fr \
--cc=Rakesh@asu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.