From: Beezly <beezly@beezly.org.uk>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sun GEM card looses TX on x86 32bit PCI
Date: 12 Mar 2002 20:34:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1015965269.1937.22.camel@monkey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020312.093134.35196670.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1015881102.4312.10.camel@monkey> <1015881814.4315.12.camel@monkey> <1015887102.2051.4.camel@monkey> <20020312.093134.35196670.davem@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2630 bytes --]
Hi David,
This looks like it's working!
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:BA:04:5B:D7
inet addr:10.0.0.12 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::203:baff:fe04:5bd7/10 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:623264 errors:0 dropped:4 overruns:4 frame:4
TX packets:501679 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:864388119 (824.3 MiB) TX bytes:719041874 (685.7 MiB)
Interrupt:5 Base address:0x8400
There are a few dropped packets, and the card misses a few incoming
immediatly after a dropped packet although I guess this is it picking
itself up off the ground after RX has hung.
Also, regarding the missing MAC address on most architectures, I have it
on good authority that the last six digits of the MAC address are stored
in the Vital Product Data area on the PCI boards (presumably because the
first 6 are the "standard" SUN MAC prefix).
I had a quick fiddle around with pci_find_capability(<blah>,
PCI_CAP_ID_VPD), but it always returns NULL (i.e. no VPD). However, I've
also noticed that no-one appears to use that macro in any of the kernel
source. Is there another way to look at the VPD?
Many Thanks,
Beezly
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 17:31, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Beezly <beezly@beezly.org.uk>
> Date: 11 Mar 2002 22:51:42 +0000
>
> Ok, I've been fiddling around with the driver tonight and have managed
> to get a little further by forcing the driver to do a full reset of the
> chip when the RX buffer over flows. I achieved this by sticking a return
> 1; at the top of gem_rxmac_reset().
>
> I'm guessing this isn't an "optimal" reset for the situation but so far
> it's having /reasonable/ results (i.e. I don't have to bring the
> interface up and down every 30 seconds!).
> ...
> Hope this helps,
>
> I'll follow up on this and figure out why my RX reset code
> isn't working after I finish up some 2.5.x work.
>
> But looking quickly I think I see what is wrong. Please give
> this a try (and remember to remove your hacks before testing
> this :-):
>
> --- drivers/net/sungem.c.~1~ Mon Mar 11 04:24:13 2002
> +++ drivers/net/sungem.c Tue Mar 12 09:30:38 2002
> @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ static int gem_rxmac_reset(struct gem *g
>
> rxd->status_word = cpu_to_le64(RXDCTRL_FRESH(gp));
> }
> + gp->rx_new = gp->rx_old = 0;
>
> /* Now we must reprogram the rest of RX unit. */
> desc_dma = (u64) gp->gblock_dvma;
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-12 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-10 20:36 Sun GEM card looses TX on x86 32bit PCI Beezly
2002-03-11 0:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11 8:19 ` Beezly
2002-03-11 12:19 ` Beezly
2002-03-11 12:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11 18:35 ` Beezly
2002-03-11 19:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11 21:11 ` Beezly
2002-03-11 21:23 ` Beezly
2002-03-11 22:51 ` Beezly
2002-03-12 17:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-12 20:34 ` Beezly [this message]
2002-03-12 20:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-14 20:43 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-03-14 21:21 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-03-11 1:39 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11 1:58 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-11 8:29 ` Beezly
2002-03-11 8:42 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1015965269.1937.22.camel@monkey \
--to=beezly@beezly.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.