All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liam Girdwood <l_girdwood@bitwise.co.uk>
To: BALBIR SINGH <balbir.singh@wipro.com>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Olaf Fraczyk <olaf@navi.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?
Date: 16 Apr 2002 11:29:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1018952961.31914.446.camel@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAEGIMDAKGCBHLBAACGBEEONCEAA.balbir.singh@wipro.com>

On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 09:18, BALBIR SINGH wrote:
> I remember seeing somewhere unix system VII used to have HZ set to 60
> for the machines built in the 70's. I wonder if todays pentium iiis and ivs
> should still use HZ of 100, though their internal clock is in GHz. 
> 
> I think somethings in the kernel may be tuned for the value of HZ, these
> things would be arch specific.
> 
> Increasing the HZ on your system should change the scheduling behaviour,
> it could lead to more aggresive scheduling and could affect the
> behaviour of the VM subsystem if scheduling happens more frequently. I am
> just guessing, I do not know.
> 

I remember reading that a higher HZ value will make your machine more
responsive, but will also mean that each running process will have a
smaller CPU time slice and that the kernel will spend more CPU time
scheduling at the expense of processes. 


HTH 

Liam Girdwood

> Changing though trivial would require a good look at all the code that
> uses HZ.
> 
> Comments,
> Balbir
> 
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> |[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of William Lee
> |Irwin III
> |Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:45 PM
> |To: Olaf Fraczyk
> |Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> |Subject: Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?
> |
> |
> |On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:47:48AM +0200, Olaf Fraczyk wrote:
> |> Hi,
> |> I would like to know why exactly this value was choosen.
> |> Is it safe to change it to eg. 1024? Will it break anything?
> |> What else should I change to get it working:
> |> CLOCKS_PER_SEC?
> |> Please CC me.
> |> Regards,
> |> Olaf Fraczyk
> |
> |I tried a few times running with HZ == 1024 for some testing (or I guess
> |just to see what happened). I didn't see any problems, even without the
> |obscure CLOCKS_PER_SEC ELF business.
> |
> |
> |Cheers,
> |Bill
> |-
> |To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> |the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> |More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> |Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> ----
> 

> **************************Disclaimer************************************
>       
> 
> 
> Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited
> is 'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any
> use, copying or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL
> in any manner whatsoever is strictly prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
>  ********************************************************************
-- 
Liam Girdwood
l_girdwood@bitwise.co.uk (Work)
liam@nova-ioe.org (Home)


  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-16  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-16  7:47 Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? Olaf Fraczyk
2002-04-16  8:14 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-04-16  8:18   ` BALBIR SINGH
2002-04-16 10:29     ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
2002-04-16 10:01       ` Olaf Fraczyk
2002-04-16 13:35         ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-16 13:38           ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-16 13:55             ` Terje Eggestad
2002-04-16 15:32             ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-16 16:12               ` Chris Friesen
2002-04-16 17:12               ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-16 13:58           ` Alan Cox
2002-04-17  0:22             ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-16 16:27         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:50           ` David Mosberger
2002-04-16 17:18             ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-16 17:52               ` David Mosberger
2002-04-16 18:10                 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-17  0:49               ` David Mosberger
2002-04-17  0:57                 ` Robert Love
2002-04-17  1:07                   ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-17  5:18                   ` Mark Mielke
2002-04-17  5:34                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-17  6:01                       ` Robert Love
2002-04-17  6:17                         ` David Mosberger
2002-04-17  7:59                         ` arjan
2002-04-17  8:04                         ` Matti Aarnio
2002-04-23 22:42                           ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-04-17 10:12                       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18  1:51                   ` Dan Mann
2002-04-17  1:22                 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-04-17  3:19                 ` Ben Greear
2002-04-17  7:55                 ` Helge Hafting
2002-04-21 18:00                 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-22 17:20                   ` John Alvord
2002-04-22 21:52                     ` george anzinger
2002-04-22 23:06                       ` J.D. Bakker
2002-04-22 23:26                       ` Anton Blanchard
2002-04-23 19:03                         ` george anzinger
2002-04-23  7:08                       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-22 17:24                   ` David Mosberger
2002-04-16 12:42     ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-16 12:31   ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-16 14:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-16 21:34 ` bert hubert
2002-04-16 22:21   ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-16 22:37     ` Herbert Xu
2002-04-16 22:56       ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-17  0:34         ` J. Dow
2002-04-17  2:40         ` Herbert Xu
2002-04-17 12:44       ` Kent Borg
2002-04-17  8:28     ` please merge 64-bit jiffy patches. Was " bert hubert
2002-04-17 11:05       ` please merge 64-bit jiffy patches Tim Schmielau
2002-04-17 11:12         ` bert hubert
2002-04-17 12:33           ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-17 12:42             ` bert hubert
2002-04-17 14:57               ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-17 11:09       ` please merge 64-bit jiffy patches. Was Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? Wakko Warner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-16 10:41 Cabaniols, Sebastien
2002-04-17  0:33 Chen, Kenneth W
2002-04-17  1:02 ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found] <3CC4861C.F21859A6@mvista.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <E16zuPf-0007yD-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-04-23  7:17   ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-23 19:09     ` george anzinger
2002-04-24  1:42       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-24 20:20         ` george anzinger
2002-04-27 20:26           ` Alan Cox
2002-04-28  6:02             ` george anzinger
2002-04-28  9:12               ` Alan Cox
2002-04-28 17:34                 ` george anzinger
2002-04-28 18:59                   ` Alan Cox
2002-04-28 21:50                     ` george anzinger
2002-04-29  0:14                       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-23 19:24     ` george anzinger
2002-04-23 19:35       ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-24 17:25         ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1018952961.31914.446.camel@swordfish \
    --to=l_girdwood@bitwise.co.uk \
    --cc=balbir.singh@wipro.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olaf@navi.pl \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.