From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314557AbSEFQt6>; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:49:58 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314571AbSEFQt5>; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:49:57 -0400
Received: from mail.interware.hu ([195.70.32.130]:27340 "EHLO
	mail.interware.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S314557AbSEFQt4>; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:49:56 -0400
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 as a router, when is it appropriate?
From: Hirling Endre <endre@interware.hu>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020505.191805.71496104.davem@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 
Date: 06 May 2002 18:49:54 +0200
Message-Id: <1020703794.4267.8.camel@dusk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Scanner: exiscan *174lgQ-0008Ib-00*SvBczMxVEaA* http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 04:18, David S. Miller wrote:
    
> We're talking about several hundred kilo packet per second routing
> over gigabit.

What kind of hardware are those routers?

endre