From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: BTW: 2.4.19-patches-to-come? Date: 08 May 2002 09:16:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1020863775.32044.208.camel@tiny> References: <3CD72AB1.6010607@netscape.net> <20020507092207.A6678@namesys.com> <3CD82C76.2080706@netscape.net> <20020508093044.A32071@namesys.com> <1020863090.32044.202.camel@tiny> <20020508170845.A3020@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: In-Reply-To: <20020508170845.A3020@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Manuel Krause , reiserfs-list On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 09:08, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:04:50AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > > > I don't find this information very explicative. And I really don't know > > > > enough about reiserfs code to interprete these lines. BTW, can we have a > > > > "ReiserFS: " in front of these messages? > > > In fact I think these messages should not be printed at all, there is no > > > useful information given to the user. > > I like a summary line: completed X number of truncates and N number of > > deletes. > > This one can stay, but I am not yet sure we need it anyway. > I think we should only print this stuff (keys of individual deleted objects > and total number of late deletions/truncates) if CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK > was enabled, what do you think? I like the single line summary, it helps for things like Dirk Mueller's problem report. 'every time my system , it is preceded by messages about some number of completed truncates or unlinks'. It might point us in the wrong direction, but it is still good information to have. -chris