All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: seth vidal <skvidal@phy.duke.edu>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: "Lever, Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: RedHat 7.3 crashed NetApp?
Date: 17 May 2002 21:43:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1021686216.2334.16.camel@milo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020517201759.C16999@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1009 bytes --]

On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 20:17, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> [a few data points from the bugzilla entries]
> 
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:17:53PM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote:
> > i'm wondering what are the common elements here:
> > 
> > is the EEpro 100 ethernet card common to all clients
> > that exhibit this problem?
> 
> eepro, tulip, 3com have all shown problems with 2.4.18 (at least 
> serious performance issues).
> 
> >  NFSv3 over UDP?
> 
> Yes.  A number of people have now reported that forcing v2 operation 
> does not result in slow performance, whereas in the 2.4.9-ac12 based 
> kernel, v3 was fine.
> 

from the discussion in bugzilla it seemed like a fair number of people
were suffering from the nfs defaults going to nfsv3, upd and 32768 wsize
and rsize/ 32768 bytes. That size of packet is going to be hard for even
REALLY well maintained networks to manage.

It might be worthwhile to try out the nfsv3 client over tcp and see if
the same problems occur. 

-sv


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-18  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-17 22:17 RedHat 7.3 crashed NetApp? Lever, Charles
2002-05-18  0:17 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-05-18  1:43   ` seth vidal [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-21 21:53 Vladimir Vuksan
2002-05-20 14:19 Lever, Charles
2002-05-20 14:46 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-05-17 13:14 Cooke, Alan
2002-05-17 15:11 ` H . J . Lu
2002-05-17 17:16   ` Daryl Herzmann
2002-05-17 17:32     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-05-16 22:39 H . J . Lu
2002-05-16 23:16 ` seth vidal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1021686216.2334.16.camel@milo \
    --to=skvidal@phy.duke.edu \
    --cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.