From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
Dawson Engler <engler@csl.Stanford.EDU>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mc@cs.Stanford.EDU
Subject: Re: [CHECKER] 37 stack variables >= 1K in 2.4.17
Date: 12 Jun 2002 15:44:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1023921856.1476.64.camel@sinai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020612183854.B4081@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 15:38, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Perfection isn't what I'm looking for, rather just an approximation.
> Any tool would have to give up on non-trivial recursion, or have
> additional rules imposed on the system. Checker seems to be growing
> functionality in this area, so it seems like a useful feature request.
I do not want to give up on this idea, either... if the implementation
needs to be "hackish" or even explicitly ignore certain functions, so be
it. There is a _lot_ that can be done with detailed call chain analysis
-- the point you gave is one of many.
Checker already has some basic functionality here I suspect based on
what it is capable of reporting... imagine what more could be reported?
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-12 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-10 3:56 [CHECKER] 37 stack variables >= 1K in 2.4.17 Dawson Engler
2002-06-12 8:43 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-12 19:11 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-06-12 21:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-12 22:26 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-12 22:38 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-12 22:44 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-06-12 22:55 ` procfs documentation Tom Bradley
2002-06-13 11:17 ` John Levon
2002-06-13 0:20 ` [CHECKER] 37 stack variables >= 1K in 2.4.17 Alexander Viro
2002-06-13 8:30 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-13 13:24 ` Roger Larsson
2002-06-14 10:06 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-13 6:38 ` Dawson Engler
2002-06-13 6:59 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-13 17:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-13 17:53 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-13 18:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-13 17:56 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-13 18:26 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-13 19:01 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-14 0:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-06-13 21:50 ` Dawson Engler
2002-06-13 22:43 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-14 0:25 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-13 6:36 ` Dawson Engler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-16 0:48 Andries.Brouwer
2002-06-16 1:08 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-16 7:47 Andries.Brouwer
2002-06-16 8:36 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-16 9:59 Andries.Brouwer
2002-06-16 10:33 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-16 10:56 Andries.Brouwer
2002-06-16 11:38 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-16 13:13 Andries.Brouwer
2002-06-16 18:51 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-16 20:41 Andries.Brouwer
2002-06-16 21:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-06-16 21:34 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-17 10:09 ` David Woodhouse
2002-06-16 22:05 Andries.Brouwer
2002-06-16 23:57 ` Alexander Viro
2002-06-17 11:07 Andries.Brouwer
2002-06-17 12:00 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1023921856.1476.64.camel@sinai \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=engler@csl.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mc@cs.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.