From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:32:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:32:40 -0400 Received: from mail45-s.fg.online.no ([148.122.161.45]:18917 "EHLO mail45.fg.online.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 10:32:38 -0400 Subject: df on a nfs mounted share vs local? From: "Nils O." =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sel=E5sdal?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <1025793209.10267.5.camel@space> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 04 Jul 2002 16:35:04 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just wondering, how come df reports root:~# df /mnt/export/ Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda5 2562252 383792 2178460 15% /mnt/export on the server, while on a client that mounts /mnt/export over nfs: [root@space download]# df /mnt/nfs/ Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on lfs:/mnt/export 2562256 383792 2178464 15% /mnt/nfs Just a few blocks diffrent, but I've seen much bigger.. also seen +/- a few % on "Use" -- Nils Olav Selåsdal System Developer, UtelSystems a/s w w w . u t e l s y s t e m s . c o m