From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Subject: Re: 2.4.19-pending is pending
Date: 05 Aug 2002 21:06:11 -0400
Message-ID: <1028595971.1759.369.camel@tiny>
References: <3D4F0A0A.4050603@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
	<1028592182.1759.300.camel@tiny> <3D4F16F4.9060802@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> 
	<3D4F1A49.706@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-11129-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <3D4F1A49.706@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Manuel Krause <manuel.krause@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
Cc: reiserfs-list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 20:37, Manuel Krause wrote:
 
> Yes, I forgot,
> 
> I want your patches to be on the namesys server in _this_ pending 
> directory, too, at least. Especially after Hans' latest remark.
> 
> There should be more service on ReiserFS overall integrity, maybe, 
> including your quota related work(!).

Many of my patches do end up in the namesys pending directory.  The ones
I put on the suse ftp server are there because I expect to have to
maintain them over the long term, and I want them applied as a specific
controlled set.

The namesys site could mirror them, but it is usually easier to keep
things up to date by just linking to my ftp directory on a web page.

It does make it a little more difficult to follow the bleeding edge, but
that's supposed to hurt, it adds to the sense of reward.

You're right though, I'll start signing the stuff on my ftp directory.

-chris