All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"Guo, Junfeng" <junfeng.guo@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"He, Xingguang" <xingguang.he@intel.com>,
	"Laatz, Kevin" <kevin.laatz@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples/ntb: remove redundant logic for dev close
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:53:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10294010.qUNvkh4Gvn@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB37238A75ED1B0F4DED2ED578E724A@DM6PR11MB3723.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

28/06/2023 04:37, Guo, Junfeng:
> From: Guo, Junfeng
> > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > 14/06/2023 07:14, Junfeng Guo:
> > > > During EAL cleanup stage, all bus devices are cleaned up properly.
> > > > Based on this, there is no need to do extra device close process,
> > > > which may call the dev ops '*dev->dev_ops->dev_close' twice.
> > > >
> > > > If this dev ops for ntb was called twice, the interrupt handle for
> > > > EAL will be disabled twice and will lead to error for the seconde
> > > > time. Like this: "EAL: Error disabling MSI-X interrupts for fd xx"
> > >
> > > You should fix ntb to not disable interrupt twice.
> > 
> > Thanks for the comment!
> > 
> > Yes, it is exactly what this patch did.
> 
> Another solution is to add extra logic in dev_close, i.e., to do the
> interrupt disabling process only when the interrupt handler is valid.
> That is, to disable interrupt only when 'intr_handle->max_intr' or
> 'intr_handle->nb_efd' is non-zero.
> 
> But I'm not sure if this method is a better solution.
> Please help give some advice, thanks!

Yes this is what I suggest.
You cannot fix all applications in the world,
but you can fix the driver, so it is a better way :)

> > The interrupt disabling process is part of 'dev_close' ops, and will be
> > called twice (one in EAL cleanup, another in ntb example cleanup).
> > 
> > Now that fixed & covered by the EAL cleanup, there is no need to
> > run dev_close at ntb example. Just remove that redundant logic.




  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-28  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-14  5:14 [PATCH] examples/ntb: remove redundant logic for dev close Junfeng Guo
2023-06-15  8:28 ` Ling, WeiX
2023-06-28  0:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-28  2:19   ` Guo, Junfeng
2023-06-28  2:37     ` Guo, Junfeng
2023-06-28  7:53       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2023-06-28  8:08         ` Guo, Junfeng
2023-06-28  9:12 ` [PATCH v2] raw/ntb: add check for disabling interrupt in dev close ops Junfeng Guo
2023-06-29  8:03   ` Ling, WeiX
2023-07-03  6:53   ` Wu, Jingjing
2023-07-03 15:44     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10294010.qUNvkh4Gvn@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=junfeng.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=xingguang.he@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.