Re: [PATCH] (0/4) Entropy accounting fixes

[Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>]

On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 23:05, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> This is particularly true on things like embedded routers, where the 
> machine usually doesn't actually _run_ much user-level software, but is 
> just shuffling packets back and forth. Your logic seems to make it not add 
> any entropy from those packets, which can be _deadly_ if then the router 
> is also used for occasionally generating some random numbers for other 
> things.

Agreed.  Further, embedded routers - since they are headless/diskless -
have problems even with the _current_ /dev/random code.  They simply do
not generate enough entropy to fulfill sshd requests [1].

Saying "use /dev/urandom" in this case means we may as well not have a
/dev/random.  There is a difference between incorrect accounting (which
it seems you have identified) and just too strict gathering behavior.

	Robert Love

[1] this is why I wrote my netdev-random patches.  some machines just
    have to take the entropy from the network card... there is nothing
    else.