From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:21:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:21:03 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:53509 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:21:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] hyperthreading scheduler improvement From: Robert Love To: Alan Cox Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1030392908.2776.17.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1030392337.15007.413.camel@phantasy> <1030392908.2776.17.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 26 Aug 2002 16:25:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1030393512.15007.435.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 16:15, Alan Cox wrote: > This patch is disabled in -ac because it caused crashes for some users I noticed - I actually got around to doing these patches because I was trying to find a solution to that problem. :) Do you think it could be some odd behavior on non-P4 x86 SMP systems? Maybe sparse CPU ids? At least for now, this 2.5 patch is P4-only. Robert Love