From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Dan Aloni <da-x@gmx.net>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@zip.com.au
Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection.
Date: 06 Sep 2002 10:35:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1031322928.940.41.camel@phantasy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020906092829.GA32379@callisto.yi.org>
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 05:28, Dan Aloni wrote:
> task_t, anyone?
I actually like task_t, and it is my lone typedef exception, but maybe I
am the exception...
My real complaint against typedefs (and list_t in particular) is their
inconsistent use. I think we have done a good job universally using
task_t vs struct task_struct, and thus its not an issue to keep it...
On the other hand, I would not scream too loudly over its removal.
Anyhow, I think any change should be ack'ed by Ingo because its his code
and he deals with it a disappropriately large amount of the time.
Robert Love
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-06 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-02 5:23 [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection Rusty Russell
2002-09-02 5:51 ` Robert Love
2002-09-02 6:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-02 6:20 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-02 10:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 10:05 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-02 10:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 10:11 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-02 10:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 10:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-02 10:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-03 22:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2002-09-03 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-04 0:41 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-04 1:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-04 2:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-04 2:44 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-04 14:36 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-09-04 6:11 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-02 6:23 ` Neil Brown
2002-09-01 20:45 ` Nick Piggin
2002-09-02 6:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-02 10:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 10:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-09-02 6:17 ` Rusty Russell
2002-09-06 9:28 ` Dan Aloni
2002-09-06 14:35 ` Robert Love [this message]
2002-09-09 5:57 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1031322928.940.41.camel@phantasy \
--to=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=da-x@gmx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.