From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 1/4] glibc: Perform rseq(2) registration at nptl init and thread creation (v4) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:27:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1031872348.636.1547497648914.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20181204192141.4684-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <87h8fkz6qx.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <1681283664.1380.1547152315426.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <87fttv9iic.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <394676913.486.1547493757710.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <87y37n8202.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87y37n8202.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Weimer Cc: carlos , Joseph Myers , Szabolcs Nagy , libc-alpha , Thomas Gleixner , Ben Maurer , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Will Deacon , Dave Watson , Paul Turner , Rich Felker , linux-kernel , linux-api List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org ----- On Jan 14, 2019, at 2:37 PM, Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com wrote: > * Mathieu Desnoyers: >=20 >> ----- On Jan 14, 2019, at 10:55 AM, Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com wr= ote: >> >>> * Mathieu Desnoyers: >>>=20 >>>> Therefore, both symbols will end up in >>>> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/Versions. >>>=20 >>> I'm not sure what you mean by that. The physical location in the >>> directory tree has little effect on which shared object the symbol is >>> placed in; that will need other changes. >> >> I'm currently moving the symbol definitions to csu/rseq-sym.c. On Linux, >> its content is overridden by a new sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/rseq-sym.c >> which contains both __rseq_abi and __rseq_refcount symbols. On other >> platforms, it is a stub file. >=20 > You don't need a stub file if you use the =E2=80=9Cifeq ($(subdir),csu)= =E2=80=9D > construct. OK >=20 > The other question is whether this belongs into the csu subdirectory. > Since TLS is not available in ld.so, the initialization would have to > happen rather late, after relocation, but before ELF constructors are > run. >=20 > (A side effect is that the rseq area would not be usable from IFUNC > resolvers.) Do you have a specific directory location in mind where we should put the built object ? e.g. "ifeq ($(subdir),posix)" or "ifeq ($(subdir),misc)" ? Moreover, from where should we call the rseq initialization ? I'm having trouble with invalid system calls parameters if I place it in LIBC_START_MAIN() just before or after the call to __pthread_initialize_min= imal. I get what appears to be invalid parameters to sys_rseq, possibly due to stack corruption (?). I'm investigating at the moment. But if you prefer we call the rseq init from elsewhere, please let me know. Thanks, Mathieu --=20 Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com