All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Ville Herva <vherva@niksula.hut.fi>,
	Alexei Podtelezhnikov <apodtele@mccammon.ucsd.edu>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:55:30 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1032764130.3d8ebae220908@kolivas.net> (raw)


One of those 2.96 compilers snuck in (my poor use of autocomplete). I take back
all the previous data and submit accurate ones, and apologise profusely for
ruining the signal to noise ratio on this list

To rehash what the last results were _supposed_ to be and what these are. I have
identical config 2.5.38 kernels compiled with either gcc2.95.3 or gcc3.2. Then I
run these two kernels through a contest benchmark (http://contest.kolivas.net)
using ONLY gcc2.95.3 to run the benchmark.

Kernel                  Time            CPU
NoLoad:
2.5.38                  68.25           99%
2.5.38-gcc32            67.28           99%
Process Load:
2.5.38                  71.60           95%
2.5.38-gcc32            70.86           94%
IO Half Load:
2.5.38                  81.26           90%
2.5.38-gcc32            88.11           82%
IO Full Load:
2.5.38                  170.21          42%
2.5.38-gcc32            230.77          30%
Mem Load:
2.5.38                  104.22          70%
2.5.38-gcc32            104.97          70%

This time only the IO loads showed a statistically significant difference.

Terribly sorry about that previous mess


Full logs:

2.5.38 (with gcc2.95.3)
noload Time: 68.25  CPU: 99%  Major Faults: 204613  Minor Faults: 255906
process_load Time: 71.60  CPU: 95%  Major Faults: 204019  Minor Faults: 255238
io_halfmem Time: 81.26  CPU: 90%  Major Faults: 204019  Minor Faults: 255325
Was writing number 4 of a 112Mb sized io_load file after 90 seconds
io_fullmem Time: 170.21  CPU: 42%  Major Faults: 204019  Minor Faults: 255272
Was writing number 6 of a 224Mb sized io_load file after 194 seconds
mem_load Time: 104.22  CPU: 70%  Major Faults: 204120  Minor Faults: 256271

2.5.38 (with gcc 3.2)
noload Time: 67.28  CPU: 99%  Major Faults: 205108  Minor Faults: 256153
process_load Time: 70.86  CPU: 94%  Major Faults: 204019  Minor Faults: 254983
io_halfmem Time: 88.11  CPU: 82%  Major Faults: 204019  Minor Faults: 255110
Was writing number 5 of a 112Mb sized io_load file after 99 seconds
io_fullmem Time: 230.77  CPU: 30%  Major Faults: 204019  Minor Faults: 254998
Was writing number 11 of a 224Mb sized io_load file after 303 seconds
mem_load Time: 104.97  CPU: 70%  Major Faults: 204208  Minor Faults: 255956

Con.

             reply	other threads:[~2002-09-23  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-23  6:55 Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-09-23  7:49 ` [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 10:30   ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 11:03     ` jw schultz
2002-09-23 12:47     ` Erik Andersen
2002-09-23 13:00       ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 13:15       ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 13:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 14:09           ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 18:24       ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-23 14:02     ` Ryan Anderson
2002-09-23 14:15       ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-23 14:24         ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-23 14:34           ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-09-23 16:03             ` Måns Rullgård
2002-09-23 14:43           ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-24 21:30             ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-23 16:34           ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-09-23 21:47             ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24  1:12               ` jw schultz
2002-09-24  9:18                 ` Jan Hudec
2002-09-23 14:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 14:36       ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 21:27   ` Bill Davidsen
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209232236070.27095-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2002-09-24  2:45 ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24  3:01   ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-24  9:34     ` Jan Hudec
2002-09-24 13:45     ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-24  9:26       ` Con Kolivas
2002-09-24 14:19         ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-09-24 15:47       ` Mark Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1032764130.3d8ebae220908@kolivas.net \
    --to=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=apodtele@mccammon.ucsd.edu \
    --cc=dan@debian.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=vherva@niksula.hut.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.