From: Heinz-Josef Claes <hjclaes@web.de>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Cc: teodarren@myrealbox.com
Subject: Re: Reiserfs with Samba vs NetApp Filer
Date: 12 Oct 2002 16:34:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1034433275.1266.14.camel@kakapo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021011125412.2fe02af7.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com>
Am Fre, 2002-10-11 um 12.54 schrieb Philippe Gramoullé:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:40:41 +0200
> Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> wrote:
>
> | On 2002-10-10T19:53:38,
> | Philippe Gramoullé <philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> said:
> |
> | > Yes, that's what i meant by "not *out of the box* snapshots".
> |
> | Well, LVM functionality comes out of the box with all modern distributions.
>
> Ok let me rephrase it: First i didn't want to start a thread on pros/cons of LVM.
>
> And i only wanted to say that LVM (though part of all modern distributions) doesn't
> come installed out of the box,at least not on Debain , which we use mainly.
> Whereas snapshots on Netapp comes out of the box with DATAONTAP.
>
> But LVM is there of course if one needs snapshot functionnality.
>
Some years ago I was responsible for buying some filers for a very
critical environment (a dealing room), so I got some experiences (also
with errors).
The snapshot functionnality of the filers makes a snapshot on the block
layer on a big filesystem in a minute or so. The mainly needed overhead
are the used blocks between the snapshot (or after the snapshot). This
is not comparable to a snapshot of EMC, which is simply a copy of the
hole disk to another one (with RAID under it and so on ...).
Is LVM comparable to netapp or to EMC snapshot?
I was very impressed by the netapp snapshot because you can make a
snapshot very fast (mainly the inodes are copied) and also online during
the day (which we did). The users could themselfes restore there data
via normal filesystem operations. We had nearly no need anymore to
restore data from tapes.
(This was the reason why I wrote storeBackup, a simple tool which has
some disadvantages and also some advantages compared to a filer.)
Hope this clearyfies the functionality of the Netapp snapshot, which I
think is patented!
--
Heinz-Josef Claes hjclaes@web.de
project: http://sourceforge.net/projects/storebackup
-> snapshot-like backup to another disk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-12 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-10 7:01 Reiserfs and recovering from the format action Fabrizio Morbini
2002-10-10 1:48 ` Reiserfs with Samba vs NetApp Filer darren
2002-10-10 14:58 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2002-10-10 17:31 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-10 17:53 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2002-10-10 18:02 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-10 18:57 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-10-10 19:00 ` Dieter Nützel
2002-10-11 10:40 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-10-11 10:54 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2002-10-11 12:34 ` Adrian Phillips
2002-10-11 13:05 ` Philippe Gramoullé
2002-10-12 14:34 ` Heinz-Josef Claes [this message]
[not found] ` <200210112022.27319.russell@coker.com.au>
2002-10-11 20:00 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-12 8:52 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-12 9:59 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-14 2:21 ` Reiserfs with Samba vs NetApp Filer (purely performance) darren
2002-12-14 21:19 ` Hans Reiser
2002-12-14 22:34 ` Richard Sharpe
2002-12-14 23:11 ` Ragnar Kjørstad
2002-12-14 23:21 ` Hans Reiser
2002-12-15 2:13 ` Richard Sharpe
2002-12-15 2:09 ` Richard Sharpe
[not found] ` <20021012150028.G14731@vestdata.no>
2002-10-12 14:00 ` Reiserfs with Samba vs NetApp Filer Russell Coker
2002-10-12 14:47 ` Adrian Phillips
2002-10-12 21:55 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-12 22:29 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-13 1:23 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-13 6:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-13 13:48 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-13 15:46 ` Andreas Dilger
[not found] ` <20021013181003.D24037@vestdata.no>
2002-10-13 16:36 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-14 3:50 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-14 10:48 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-12 23:02 ` The Amazing Dragon
2002-10-12 23:27 ` Russell Coker
[not found] ` <20021013020800.T14731@vestdata.no>
2002-10-13 1:39 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-13 6:52 ` The Amazing Dragon
[not found] ` <20021014175909.GA10292@tapu.f00f.org>
2002-10-14 20:52 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-14 21:24 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <20021014225812.GA11337@tapu.f00f.org>
2002-10-15 12:57 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-15 13:42 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-15 14:46 ` Russell Coker
2002-10-15 13:43 ` Hans Reiser
2002-10-10 11:31 ` Reiserfs and recovering from the format action Oleg Drokin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1034433275.1266.14.camel@kakapo \
--to=hjclaes@web.de \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=teodarren@myrealbox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.