From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 24 May 2001 18:03:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 24 May 2001 18:03:33 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:43765 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 24 May 2001 18:03:25 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <200105242107.OAA29730@csl.Stanford.EDU> In-Reply-To: <200105242107.OAA29730@csl.Stanford.EDU> To: Dawson Engler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mc@cs.Stanford.EDU, arjanv@redhat.com Subject: Re: [CHECKER] error path memory leaks in 2.4.4 and 2.4.4-ac8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 23:02:45 +0100 Message-ID: <10347.990741765@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org engler@csl.Stanford.EDU said: > 1 | drivers/mtd/mtdchar.c > 1 | fs/jffs/jffs_fm.c > 2 | fs/jffs/intrep.c > 1 | drivers/mtd/slram.c > 1 | drivers/mtd/ftl.c > 1 | drivers/mtd/mtdram.c These are all now either fixed or obsoleted in my tree, and I will send a patch to Linus shortly. Thankyou. Do you find it useful to get a response such as this? Are you keeping track of the bugs you find? (Or is it simply reassuring to confirm that someone's paying attention? :) engler@csl.Stanford.EDU said: > Here are 37 errors where variables >= 1024 bytes are allocated on a > function's stack. > 2 | fs/jffs2/compr_rtime.c int positions[256]; I believe we can make that a short. Arjan? -- dwmw2